Bearam v. Caribbean Airlines Limited
Plaintiff: Hubert Bearam
Defendant: Caribbean Airlines Limited
Case Number: 1:2014cv05061
Filed: August 26, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: John Gleeson
Presiding Judge: Ramon E. Reyes
Nature of Suit: Airplane
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER granting 24 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of the opinion and order to plaintiff pro se and promptly close the case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ramon E. Reyes, Jr on 2/25/2016. (Reyes, Ramon)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bearam v. Caribbean Airlines Limited
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hubert Bearam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Caribbean Airlines Limited
Represented By: John Maggio
Represented By: Allison M Surcouf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?