Dillon v. City of New York et al
| Frederick Dillon |
| New York City Department of Corrections, John Doe/Jane Doe and City of New York |
| 1:2014cv05174 |
| September 2, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Joan M. Azrack |
| Nicholas G. Garaufis |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER: Plaintiff's requests to proceed IFP are DENIED without prejudice. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with any of these lawsuits, he must submit the $400 filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, and state clearly which action he wishes to pursue with the payment of that fee. To be clear, each action requires a separate $400 filing fee. The court will enter judgment dismissing without prejudice any action with respect to which Plaintiff does not pay the filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. All further proceedings shall be stayed for thirty (30) days. Furthermore, the court hereby notifies Plaintiff that if he brings any further IFP actions that fail to meet§ 1915(g)'s "imminent danger" standard, the court may enter an order barring Plaintiff from filing future IFP complaints without first obtaining leave of the court to do so. See 28 U.S.C. § 1651. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 10/9/2014. (c/m to pro se) (Lee, Tiffeny)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
