Lisnitzer v. Shah et al
| Leslie Lisnitzer |
| Elizabeth R. Berlin and Nirav R. Shah |
| 2:2011cv04641 |
| September 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Arlene R. Lindsay |
| Leonard D. Wexler |
| Civil Rights: Welfare |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
200
ORDER: Before the Court are the parties' requests to amend the Judgment dated August 31, 2022, (ECF No. 192 ), awarding Plaintiff attorneys' fees and costs. (ECF Nos. 198 , 199 .) Upon consideration of the partie' submissions, the Court amends the Order dated August 31, 2022, (ECF No. 191 ), to award Plaintiff $6,072.74, not $6,072.12, in costs. In addition, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to amend the Judgment as follows: SEE ATTACHED ORDER for further details. So Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 2/15/2023. (LC)
|
|
Filing
191
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: For the foregoing reasons (Please See Order for Further Details), the Court affirms and adopts the well-reasoned R&R in its entirety as the opinion of the Court. Plaintiff's motion for attorney's f ees and costs is GRANTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff is awarded $1,121,666.96 in attorney's fees and $6,072.12 in costs. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment in Plaintiff's favor. So Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 8/31/2022. (Ortiz, Grisel)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
