Eastern Savings Bank, FSB v. Beach et al
| Eastern Savings Bank, FSB |
| John Doe #5, John Doe #4, John Doe #3, John Doe #6, John Doe #2, John Doe #1, Charles Beach, Rosemary Beach and CLR Capital Corporation |
| 2:2013cv00341 |
| January 22, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Joanna Seybert |
| A. Kathleen Tomlinson |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM & ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - Judge Tomlinson's R&R is ADOPTED in its entirety. As such, Plaintiff's motion for default is GRANTED against Charles Beach, Rosemary Beach, and CLR Capital Corporation. Further, it is hereby ORDERED that John Does #1-6 are DISMISSED and excised from the caption. Finally, Plaintiff is hereby awarded the following: (1) principal in the amount of $299,822.99, with accrued interest of $88,237.66 through May 1, 2013 and & #036;77.95 in interest per diem thereafter until entry of judgment; (2) $9,880.55 in late charges; (3) $26,799.06 for the Negative Escrow Balance and $4,037.68 for accrued interest; (4) $4,710.00 in attorneys' fees; and (5) $1,555.70 in costs. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter a Judgment consistent with this Memorandum and Order and to mark this matter CLOSED. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 3/10/2014. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
