Mack v. Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation et al
| Dr. Eleanor Mack |
| Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation, Nora Kustin, Georgiene Kenny and Charles Seide |
| 2:2014cv01299 |
| February 26, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| William D. Wall |
| Leonard D. Wexler |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied inpart. Specifically, Defendants' motion to dismiss the federal RICO claim is granted and that claim is dismissed with prejudice. With respect to that portion of Defendants' motion that seeks a dismissal of the state law claims on their merits, that application is denied. Rather, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims and thoseclaims are accordingly dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and to thereafter close the file in this action. (Ordered by Judge Leonard D. Wexler on 10/30/2014.) (Fagan, Linda)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
