In Re Canon Inkjet Printer Litigation
Plaintiff: Sarah Barrett and Melanie Clark
Defendant: Canon U.S.A., Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff: Marcus Ho and Michael Robertson
Case Number: 2:2014cv03235
Filed: May 23, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Steven I Locke
Referring Judge: Leonard D Wexler
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 19, 2015 Filing 30 Letter to Judge Wexler Regarding Status by Sarah Barrett, Melanie Clark, Marcus Ho (Federman, William)
January 16, 2015 Filing 29 Letter re: Status by Sarah Barrett (Federman, William)
December 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER re # 27 Letter filed by Melanie Clark, Marcus Ho, Sarah Barrett. Request Granted. (Ordered by Judge Leonard D. Wexler on 12/2/2014.) (Fagan, Linda)
December 1, 2014 Filing 27 Letter to Judge Wexler Regarding Status by Sarah Barrett, Melanie Clark, Marcus Ho (Federman, William)
November 19, 2014 Opinion or Order ORDER granting # 26 Motion to Stay to the extent that a temporary stay is granted until December 1, 2014; by that date, the parties are to report to the Court their progress in resolving this action. Ordered by Judge Leonard D. Wexler on 11/19/2014. (Ausili, Peter)
October 14, 2014 Filing 26 Joint MOTION to Stay (Letter Requesting Temporary Stay) by Sarah Barrett, Melanie Clark, Marcus Ho. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Federman, William)
October 6, 2014 Filing 25 Letter to Judge Wexler requesting a pre-motion conference by Canon U.S.A., Inc. (Silberberg, Richard)
September 26, 2014 Filing 24 NOTICE by Canon U.S.A., Inc. to Withdraw as Co-Counsel for Defendant (Manson, Robert)
September 26, 2014 Filing 23 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter Overs on behalf of Marcus Ho (aty to be noticed) (Overs, Peter)
September 15, 2014 Filing 22 AMENDED COMPLAINT (Consolidated) against Canon U.S.A., Inc., filed by Sarah Barrett, Marcus Ho, Melanie Clark. (Federman, William)
September 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER: The Discovery Confidentiality and Protective Order submitted by the parties is So Ordered as revised. See attached. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 9/9/2014. (Disbrow, Sandra)
September 8, 2014 Filing 20 STIPULATION Proposed Stipulated Discovery Confidentiality and Protective Order by Canon U.S.A., Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A) (Silberberg, Richard)
August 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER APPOINTING CO-LEAD COUNSEL re # 17 Letter, filed by Sarah Barrett; That pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(g)(3), the law firms of Federman & Sherwood and Chimicles & Tikellis LLP are hereby appointed Co-Lead Counsel ("Lead Counsel"); that Lead Counsel will have sole responsibility for and authority over the following matters set forth herein, on behalf of all Plaintiffs in this action; that the law firm Harwood Feffer LLP is hereby appointed liaison counsel; and that Defendant reserves its rights to request that the Court revisit such designations as circumstances warrant and to address the adequacy of such counsel's representation in the context of any future motion relating to class certification. (Ordered by Judge Leonard D. Wexler on 8/14/2014.) (Fagan, Linda)
August 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 18 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING FILING OF CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT re # 17 Letter, filed by Sarah Barrett; That pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42, civil actions 14cv3235, 14cv4255 and 14cv4676 are consolidated; that the lead case will be 14cv3235(LDW/SIL); that the clerk of the court is directed to close case numbers 14cv4255 and 14cv4676; that subsequent filings in the Consolidated Action will bear the following caption: IN RE CANON INKJET PRINTER LITIGATION; Case No. 2:14-cv-03255(LDW/SIL); that pltffs in the consolidated action shall file a single consolidated class action complaint within 30 days of the date of the entry by the Court of this Stipulation and Order; that Canon USA shall respond to the consolidated class action complaint within 20 days of its filing and service; that the parties shall assist the Court by calling to the attention of the Clerk of the Court the filing or transfer of any case that might properly be consolidated as part of the Consolidation Action; that each new case that arises out of the subject matter of the Consolidated Action which is filed in this Court or transferred to this Court shall be consolidated with the Consolidated Action and this Stipulation and Order shall apply thereto, unless a party objects to consolidation within 10 days after the date upon which a copy of this Stipulation and Order is served on counsel for such party by filing an application for relief. (Ordered by Judge Leonard D. Wexler on 8/14/2014.) (Fagan, Linda)
August 14, 2014 Case Consolidated. (Fagan, Linda)
August 7, 2014 Filing 17 Letter regarding Consolidated Class Action Complaint and appointment of co-lead counsel by Sarah Barrett (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Stipulation and Order Regarding Filing of Consolidated Class Action Complaint, # 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order Appointing Co-Lead Counsel) (Federman, William)
August 1, 2014 Filing 16 Letter to Judge Wexler by Canon U.S.A., Inc. (Silberberg, Richard)
July 31, 2014 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Steven I Locke. Magistrate Judge William D. Wall no longer assigned to the case. (Greene, Donna)
July 25, 2014 Filing 15 Letter Regarding Pre-Motion Conference by Sarah Barrett (Federman, William)
July 17, 2014 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by James K. Langdon on behalf of Canon U.S.A., Inc. (notification declined or already on case) (Langdon, James)
July 16, 2014 Filing 13 Notice of Related Case 14CV 4255 Ho v. Canon U.S.A, Inc. (McMorrow, Karen)
July 15, 2014 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Erin P. Davenport on behalf of Canon U.S.A., Inc. (notification declined or already on case) (Davenport, Erin)
July 15, 2014 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Shari L. Aberle on behalf of Canon U.S.A., Inc. (notification declined or already on case) (Aberle, Shari)
July 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Electronic ORDER granting # 8 , # 9 , # 10 , Motions for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice, James K. Langdon, Erin P. Davenport, Shari L.J. Aberle for defendant. Counsel are directed to register for ECF if they have not already done so, and to electronically file notices of appearance. Ordered by Magistrate Judge William D. Wall on 7/9/2014. (Disbrow, Sandra)
July 8, 2014 Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 25, receipt number 0207-7050445. by Canon U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit in Support of Shari L. J. Aberle, # 2 Proposed Order) (Aberle, Shari)
July 8, 2014 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 25, receipt number 0207-7050246. by Canon U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit in Support of Erin P. Davenport, # 2 Proposed Order) (Davenport, Erin)
July 8, 2014 Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 25, receipt number 0207-7050118. by Canon U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit in Support Affidavit of James K. Langdon, # 2 Proposed Order) (Langdon, James)
July 1, 2014 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Gregory Manson on behalf of Canon U.S.A., Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Manson, Robert)
June 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Electronic ORDER granting # 6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or otherwise respond. Canon U.S.A., Inc. answer due 8/7/2014. Ordered by Magistrate Judge William D. Wall on 6/19/2014. (Disbrow, Sandra)
June 18, 2014 Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re # 1 Complaint, Stipulation and Order Extending Defendant's Time to Respond to Complaint by Canon U.S.A., Inc.. (Silberberg, Richard)
June 18, 2014 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard H. Silberberg on behalf of Canon U.S.A., Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Silberberg, Richard)
June 10, 2014 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sarah Barrett. Canon U.S.A., Inc. served on 6/2/2014, answer due 6/23/2014. (Federman, William)
May 27, 2014 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Canon U.S.A., Inc., on 05/27/2014. (Fagan, Linda)
May 23, 2014 Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf . You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences . Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (McMorrow, Karen)
May 23, 2014 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Canon U.S.A., Inc. filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-6949308 Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Sarah Barrett. (Attachments: # 1 1 - Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 2 - Proposed Summons) (Federman, William)
May 23, 2014 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. The following corrections were made: party text added to plaintiff,, county changed to outside home statem, arbitration code changed to blank. (McMorrow, Karen)
May 23, 2014 Case assigned to Judge Leonard D. Wexler and Magistrate Judge William D. Wall. (McMorrow, Karen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re Canon Inkjet Printer Litigation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sarah Barrett
Represented By: William Federman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melanie Clark
Represented By: William Federman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Consolidated plaintiff: Marcus Ho
Represented By: William Federman
Represented By: Robert Ira Harwood
Represented By: Benjamin Johns
Represented By: Joseph B. Kenney
Represented By: Peter Overs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Consolidated plaintiff: Michael Robertson
Represented By: William B. Federman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Canon U.S.A., Inc.
Represented By: Christopher D. Sileo
Represented By: Shari L. Aberle
Represented By: Erin P. Davenport
Represented By: James K. Langdon
Represented By: Robert Gregory Manson
Represented By: Richard H. Silberberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?