Strzelecki v. Cunningham

Strzelecki v. Cunningham

Petitioner:	Michael Strzelecki
Respondent:	Robert Cunningham
Case Number:	2:2015cv00133
Filed:	January 9, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge:	Sandra J. Feuerstein
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 15, 2019	Filing 10 MEMORANDUM & ORDER - Accordingly, finding the Petitioner has not demonstrated any basis for relief under U.S.C. § 2254, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition is DENIED. Further, since Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the d enial of a constitutional right, no certification of appealability shall issue. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status i s denied for the purpose of any appeal. Respondent shall make a reasonable effort to ascertain a forwarding address for Petitioner, serve a copy of this Memorandum and Order at his updated address, and file a declaration of service within 3 days of t he date of this Order. Once Respondent files proof of service, the Clerk of Court is directed to: dismiss the Petition, enter judgment in favor of Respondent, serve the Judgment on Petitioner at his updated address, note service on the docket; and, close this case. SO Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 11/15/2019. (Tirado, Chelsea)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 15, 2019

Filing 10 MEMORANDUM & ORDER - Accordingly, finding the Petitioner has not demonstrated any basis for relief under U.S.C. § 2254, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition is DENIED. Further, since Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the d enial of a constitutional right, no certification of appealability shall issue. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status i s denied for the purpose of any appeal. Respondent shall make a reasonable effort to ascertain a forwarding address for Petitioner, serve a copy of this Memorandum and Order at his updated address, and file a declaration of service within 3 days of t he date of this Order. Once Respondent files proof of service, the Clerk of Court is directed to: dismiss the Petition, enter judgment in favor of Respondent, serve the Judgment on Petitioner at his updated address, note service on the docket; and, close this case. SO Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 11/15/2019. (Tirado, Chelsea)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Strzelecki v. Cunningham
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Robert Cunningham
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Strzelecki
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?