Universal Entertainment Events Inc. et al v. Classic Air Charter Inc. et al
Lorenzo Reyes Retana and Universal Entertainment Events Inc. |
James Bartikoski, Classic Air Charter Inc., Go-Dair Inc., Javelin Air Services LLC and Donald Moss |
2:2015cv01104 |
March 3, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
Sandra J. Feuerstein |
A. Kathleen Tomlinson |
Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 78 MEMORANDUM & ORDER denying 57 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction over Deft James Bartikoski. SO ORDERED that the Court concludes that plaintiffs have made at least a prima facie showing that this Court has personal jurisdiction over Bartikoski. Accordingly, deft Bartikoski's motion to dismiss is denied in its entirety. CM to pro se deft. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 5/31/2016. (Florio, Lisa) |
Filing 67 ORDER denying 51 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. SO ORDERED that the Moving Defts motion to dismiss Count II (aiding and abetting claim against Moss and Classic Air), Count III (breach of contract claim against Classic Air), and Count IV (unjust enrichment claim against Moss), of the amended complaint is denied in its entirety. CM to pro se deft. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 3/8/2016. (Florio, Lisa) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.