Zhispon v. Strong Construction of New York Corp. et al
Manuel Zhispon |
Tito Molina and Strong Construction of New York Corp. |
2:2015cv01475 |
March 20, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Central Islip Office |
Joseph F. Bianco |
Gary R. Brown |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 206 Collect Unpaid Wages |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for damages (ECF No. 24) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff is awarded damages in the total amount of $86,597.27, plus per diem pre-judgm ent interest at a rate of $12.59 from February 16, 2012, until thedate of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on defendant and file proof of service with the CourtOrdered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 3/19/2019. (Bollbach, Jean) |
Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for damages (ECF No. 18) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff is granted leave to submit a renewed motion for damages within forty-five (45) days of this Order, by May 7, 2018. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order of defendant and file proof of service with the Court.. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bianco on 3/23/2018. (Bollbach, Jean) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.