Schoenhals v. Dowling College Chapter, New York State United Teachers, Local #3890 et al
| Martin Schoenhals |
| Dowling College, Dowling College Chapter, New York State United Teachers, Local #3890 and New York State United Teachers, AFT, AFL-CIO |
| 2:2015cv02044 |
| April 15, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Arlene R. Lindsay |
| Arthur D. Spatt |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants Dowling's 61 Rule 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings. It also notes that the Courts previous dismissal of the Plaintiffs proposed NYSHRL claim was without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. SEE ATTACHED DECISION for details. It is So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 2/19/2020. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER re Plaintiff's 27 Motion to Amend the Complaint. For the foregoing reasons, the Plaintiff's motion to amend is denied in its entirety. The Plaintiff may proceed with his cause of action for breach of the collective bargaining agreement. SEE ATTACHED DECISION for details. It is So Ordered by Judge Arthur D. Spatt on 3/20/2019. (Coleman, Laurie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
