Perez v. Byrnes et al
Plaintiff: Thomas E. Perez
Defendant: Daniel M. Byrnes and Fort Orange Capital Management, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan
Case Number: 1:2015cv00093
Filed: January 26, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Albany Office
County: Albany
Presiding Judge: Randolph F. Treece
Presiding Judge: Frederick J. Scullin
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 93 AMENDED CONSENT ORDER AND JUDGMENT: Granting the 92 Motion to Approve Amended Consent Order and Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on August 14, 2023. (rep)
October 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 91 CONSENT ORDER AND JUDGMENT: Granting the 90 Motion to Approve Consent Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on October 31, 2022. (rep)
August 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 63 JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Defendant is liable to the Plan in the amount of $310,000. This Judgment also incorporates the terms of the Court's # 48 March 28, 2017 Memorandum-Decision and Order and the terms of the Court's # 59 July 28, 2017 Order. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff. [Copy served upon pro se Defendant via regular and certified mail. ] (nmk)
March 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 48 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER: The Court hereby ORDERS that Plaintiff's # 40 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to liability. The Court further ORDERS that the parties shall file and serve documentation to support their arguments regard ing the calculation of restitution damages consistent with this Memorandum-Decision and Order as noted herein. The Court further ORDERS that Defendant is removed as trustee of the Fort Orange Capital Management, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan. The Court fu rther ORDERS that Defendant is permanently enjoined from serving as a fiduciary in the future for any ERISA-covered plan. The Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff shall file and serve a letter brief setting forth his recommendation regarding who shoul d replace Defendant as trustee of the Plan, his reasons for that recommendation, and the qualifications of said individual as noted herein. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr. on 3/28/2017. [Copy served upon pro se defendant via regular mail.] (nmk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perez v. Byrnes et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas E. Perez
Represented By: Allison L. Bowles
Represented By: Jeffrey S. Rogoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel M. Byrnes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fort Orange Capital Management, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?