Schrock v. Astrue

Schrock v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Cindy Lou Schrock
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	3:2012cv01898
Filed:	December 28, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office:	Binghamton Office
County:	Chemung
Presiding Judge:	Mae A. D'Agostino
Presiding Judge:	Christian F. Hummel
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 19, 2014	Filing 20 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 17 Report and Recommendations: The Court hereby ORDERS that Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel's February 18, 2014 Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 17) is ADOPTED in its entirety for the reas ons stated therein; and the Court further ORDERS that the decision denying benefits is AFFIRMED; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendant's m otion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in Defendant's favor and close this case; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order on the parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 6/19/14. (ban)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 19, 2014

Filing 20 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 17 Report and Recommendations: The Court hereby ORDERS that Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel's February 18, 2014 Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 17) is ADOPTED in its entirety for the reas ons stated therein; and the Court further ORDERS that the decision denying benefits is AFFIRMED; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendant's m otion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in Defendant's favor and close this case; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order on the parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 6/19/14. (ban)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schrock v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cindy Lou Schrock
Represented By:	Jonathan P. Foster
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By:	Dennis J. Canning
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?