Moran v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Chad Moran
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 3:2014cv00833
Filed: July 10, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Binghamton Office
County: Broome
Presiding Judge: Christian F. Hummel
Presiding Judge: David N. Hurd
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 23 DECISION AND ORDER granting Pltf's 21 Motion for Attorney Fees. Pltf's counsel shall refund the Pltf the sum of $5,150.00 previously awarded to counsel pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act. Pltf's counsel is awarded fees in the sum of $11,150.43 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 406(b). Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 10/25/17. (sfp, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moran v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chad Moran
Represented By: Peter A. Gorton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?