Rosa v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Michael Rosa
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 3:2014cv01145
Filed: September 18, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Binghamton Office
County: Broome
Presiding Judge: Therese Wiley Dancks
Presiding Judge: Glenn T. Suddaby
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 26 DECISION AND ORDER accepting and adopting # 25 Magistrate Judge Carter's Report and Recommendation in its entirety; the Commissioner's determination is AFFIRMED, and the Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 11/25/15. (lmw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rosa v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Rosa
Represented By: Peter A. Gorton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?