Wheeler v. Colvin
Plaintiff: David Wheeler
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 3:2015cv00105
Filed: January 28, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Binghamton Office
County: Tioga
Presiding Judge: Andrew T. Baxter
Presiding Judge: Mae A. D'Agostino
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER. It is ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision be REVERSED, and the case be REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for further administrative proceedings. Signed by U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 3/7/2016. (lah)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wheeler v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Wheeler
Represented By: Peter A. Gorton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?