PPC Broadband, Inc. v. Corning Gilbert Inc.
Plaintiff: PPC Broadband, Inc.
Defendant: Corning Gilbert Inc.
Case Number: 5:2013cv01310
Filed: October 22, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Syracuse Office
County: Onondaga
Presiding Judge: David E. Peebles
Presiding Judge: Gary L. Sharpe
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 93 SUMMARY ORDER - That PPC's 50 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 1/5/2015. (jel, )
October 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER: granting in part and denying in part the # 66 Motion to Stay, Defendant's request for an immediate stay of this action is DENIED. This case will proceed pursuant to the schedule put in place by the Court, under which the parties will ha ve 90 days to complete pretrial discovery in the action after a final claim construction decision is issued. Once discovery in this case is compete, the action will be STAYED until a final decision is rendered with regard to the IPR proceedings pendi ng before the PTAB. Upon the issuance of the last decision in those IPR proceedings by the PTAB, the stay in this action will be lifted, without prejudice to the right of the defendant Corning Optical to request an additional stay in the event an app eal is taken by any party to the Federal Circuit, and the parties will have 60 days from that date within which to file dispositive motions in the case. The Court reserves the right at any time prior to receipt of the final PTAB decisions to revisit the question of a stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 10/10/2014. (jmb)
June 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 49 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER - That PPC's 11 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. That Corning's 14 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. That the partes notify Magistrate Judge Peebles in order to schedule further proceedings in accordance with this Memorandum-Decision and Order. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 6/5/2014. (jel, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PPC Broadband, Inc. v. Corning Gilbert Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PPC Broadband, Inc.
Represented By: John D. Cook
Represented By: Jason C. Halpin
Represented By: Douglas J. Nash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Corning Gilbert Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?