Ley v. Novelis Corporation
Defendant: Novelis Corporation
Petitioner: Rhonda P. Ley
Intervenor: Richard Farrands, John Tesoriero, Michael W. Malone, Andrew Duschen, Jason McDermott, William Robinson, Stephen Wheeler and Brian Wyman
Case Number: 5:2014cv00775
Filed: June 25, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Syracuse Office
County: Oswego
Presiding Judge: David E Peebles
Referring Judge: Gary L Sharpe
Nature of Suit: Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2014 Filing 76 MANDATE of USCA withdrawing the appeal pursuant to the parties' stipulation in accordance with FRAP 42. (lah)
September 29, 2014 Filing 75 NOTICE by Novelis Corporation re #74 Judgment,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Notice of Filing Affidavit of Compliance (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Compliance)(Powell, Kurtis)
September 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 74 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that Ley's petition (Dkt. No. 1) is GRANTED IN PART as follows: 1. Novelis, its officers, representatives, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, successors and assigns, and all persons acting in concert or participation with it, pending final disposition of the matters involved herein pending before the NLRB, is enjoined and restrained from: (a) Threatening employees with plant closure if they select the Union as their bargaining representative; (b) Threatening employees with a reduction in wages if they select the Union as their bargaining representative; (c) Threatening employees with more onerous working conditions, including mandatory overtime, if they select the Union as their bargaining representative; (d) Disparaging the Union by telling employees that the Union is seeking to have Novelis rescind their pay and/or benefits; (e) Disparaging the Union by telling employees that they would have to pay back wages retroactively as a result of charges filed by the Union; (f) Threatening employees that Novelis would lose business if they select the Union as their bargaining representative; (g) Threatening employees with job loss if they select the Union as their bargaining representative; (h) Interrogating employees about their union membership, activities, and sympathies; (I) Interrogating employees about the union membership, activities and sympathies of other employees; (j) Coercing employees by asking them how to vote if they do not want the Union; (k) Threatening employees by telling them that they did not have to work for Novelis if they are unhappy with their terms and conditions of employment; (l) Prohibiting employees from wearing union insignia on their uniforms while permitting employees to wear anti-union and other insignia; (m) Promulgating and maintaining rules prohibiting all postings, distribution and solicitation related to Section 7 activities; (n) Maintaining a rule that prohibits employees from posting, soliciting and distributing literature in all areas of Novelis premises; (o) Selectively and disparately enforcing Novelis posting and distribution rules by prohibiting union postings and distributions while permitting nonunion and anti-union postings and distributions; (p) Granting wage and/or benefit increases in order to discourage employees from supporting the Union; (q) Soliciting employees' complaints and grievances and promising employees improved terms and conditions of employment if they did not select the Union as their bargaining representative; (r) Demoting employees because they engaged in protected concerted and/or Union activity; (s) Maintaining and giving effect to its overly broad unlawful social media policy; (t) In any like or related manner interfering with, restraining or coercing employees in the exercise of rights guaranteed them under Section 7 of the NLRA. 2. Novelis, its officers, representatives, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, successors and assigns, and all persons acting in concert or participation with it, pending final disposition of the matters involved herein pending before the NLRB, is directed to: (a) Within five (5) days of this order, restore Everett Abare to the position that he previously held at his previous wage and other terms and conditions of employment; (b) Post copies of the courts order at Novelis Oswego, New York, facility where notices to employees are customarily posted, those postings to be maintained during the pendency of the NLRBs administrative proceedings free from all obstructions and defacements; all unit employees shall have free and unrestricted access to said notices; (c) Grant to agents of the NLRB reasonable access to Respondents Oswego, New York, facility in order to monitor compliance with this posting requirement; (d) Within ten (10) days of the date of this order, convene the bargaining unit employees during working time at Novelis Oswego, New York, facility, at a meeting or meetings at times and places scheduled to ensure maximum possible attendance, whereupon Phil Martens or Chris Smith, in the presence of an NLRB Agent, will read the courts order to employees, or at Novelis option, have an NLRB Agent read the order in Phil Martens or Chris Smiths presence; (e) Within twenty one (21) days of the issuance of the courts order, file with the court and submit a copy to the Regional Director of Region Three of the Board, a sworn affidavit from a responsible official of Novelis setting forth, with specificity, the manner in which Novelis has complied with the terms of this decree, including how it has posted the documents required by the court's order. ORDERED that Ley's petition (Dkt. No. 1) is DENIED in all other respects, in accordance with the Memorandum-Decision and Order issued by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on September 4, 2014. (jel, )
September 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 73 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER - ORDERED that Ley's petition (Dkt. No. 1) is GRANTED IN PART as follows: 1.Novelis, its officers, representatives, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, successors and assigns, and all persons acting in concert or participation with it, pending final disposition of the matters involved herein pending before the NLRB, is enjoined and restrained from: (a)Threatening employees with plant closure if they select the Union as their bargaining representative; (b)Threatening employees with a reduction in wages if they select the Union as their bargaining representative; (c)Threatening employees with more onerous working conditions, including mandatory overtime, if they select the Union as their bargaining representative; (d)Disparaging the Union by telling employees that the Union is seeking to have Novelis rescind their pay and/or benefits; (e)Disparaging the Union by telling employees that they would have to pay back wages retroactively as a result of charges filed by the Union; (f)Threatening employees that Novelis would lose business if they select the Union as their bargaining representative; (g)Threatening employees with job loss if they select the Union as their bargaining representative; (h)Interrogating employees about their union membership, activities, and sympathies; (i)Interrogating employees about the union membership, activities and sympathies of other employees; (j)Coercing employees by asking them how to vote if they do not want the Union; (k)Threatening employees by telling them that they did not have to work for Novelis if they are unhappy with their terms and conditions of employment; (l)Prohibiting employees from wearing union insignia on their uniforms while permitting employees to wear anti-union and other insignia; (m)Promulgating and maintaining rules prohibiting all postings, distribution and solicitation related to Section 7 activities; (n)Maintaining a rule that prohibits employees from posting, soliciting and distributing literature in all areas of Novelis premises; (o)Selectively and disparately enforcing Novelis posting and distribution rules by prohibiting union postings and distributions while permitting nonunion and anti-union postings and distributions; (p)Granting wage and/or benefit increases in order to discourage employees from supporting the Union; (q)Soliciting employees' complaints and grievances and promising employees improved terms and conditions of employment if they did not select the Union as their bargaining representative; (r)Demoting employees because they engaged in protected concerted and/or Union activity; (s)Maintaining and giving effect to its overly broad unlawful social media policy; (t)In any like or related manner interfering with, restraining or coercing employees in the exercise of rights guaranteed them under Section 7 of the NLRA. 2.Novelis, its officers, representatives, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, successors and assigns, and all persons acting in concert or participation with it, pending final disposition of the matters involved herein pending before the NLRB, is directed to: (a)Within five (5) days of this order, restore Everett Abare to the position that he previously held at his previous wage and other terms and conditions of employment; (b)Post copies of the courts order at Novelis Oswego, New York, facility where notices to employees are customarily posted, those postings to be maintained during the pendency of the NLRBs administrative proceedings free from all obstructions and defacements; all unit employees shall have free and unrestricted access to said notices; (c)Grant to agents of the NLRB reasonable access to Respondents Oswego, New York, facility in order to monitor compliance with this posting requirement; (d)Within ten (10) days of the date of this order, convene the bargaining unit employees during working time at Novelis Oswego, New York, facility, at a meeting or meetings at times and places scheduled to ensure maximum possible attendance, whereupon Phil Martens or Chris Smith, in the presence of an NLRB Agent, will read the courts order to employees, or at Novelis option, have an NLRB Agent read the order in Phil Martens or Chris Smiths presence;(e)Within twenty one (21) days of the issuance of the courts order, file with the court and submit a copy to the Regional Director of Region Three of the Board, a sworn affidavit from a responsible official of Novelis setting forth, with specificity, the manner in which Novelis has complied with the terms of this decree, including how it has posted the documents required by the court's order. ORDERED that Ley's petition (Dkt. No. 1) is DENIED in all other respects. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 9/4/2014. (jel, )
August 29, 2014 Filing 72 ELECTRONIC NOTICE AND CERTIFICATION sent to U.S. Court of Appeals re #69 Notice of Appeal. (lah)
August 29, 2014 Filing 71 ELECTRONIC NOTICE AND CERTIFICATION sent to U.S. Court of Appeals re #68 Notice of Appeal. (lah)
August 28, 2014 Filing 70 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Jason McDermott, William Robinson, Stephen Wheeler, Brian Wyman re #69 Notice of Appeal, (Wagner, Kenneth)
August 28, 2014 Filing 69 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #58 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion to Intervene,,,,,,,,,, by Jason McDermott, William Robinson, Stephen Wheeler, Brian Wyman. Filing fee $ 505, receipt number 0206-3034052. (Wagner, Kenneth)
August 28, 2014 Filing 68 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #58 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion to Intervene,,,,,,,,,, by Andrew Duschen, Richard Farrands, Michael W. Malone, John Tesoriero. Filing fee $ 505, receipt number 0206-3033875. (Eron, Thomas)
August 21, 2014 Text Only Minute Entry for proceedings held before Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe: CRD: John Law. Motion Hearing held on 8/21/2014 re #1 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Rhonda P. Ley. Appearances Made: Lillian Richter, Esq., for the petitioner. Kenneth L. Dobkin, Kurtis A. Powell and Edward Melvin, Esqs., for the respondent. Atty. Richter discusses petition and relief for bargaining order. Discusses hallmark violations. Atty. Powell discusses position on bargaining order. Discusses administrative law process. Discusses authorization cards. Atty. Richter further discusses petitioner's position. Atty. Powell further discusses respondent's position. Court will issue an expedited ruling. (Court Reporter Lisa Tennyson) Time: 2:00-2:30 p.m. (jel, )
August 8, 2014 Filing 67 RESPONSE in Opposition re #1 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Response to Supplemental Brief Dkt. 64 filed by Novelis Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1 - Farrand Declaration Dkt No 29-3)(Powell, Kurtis)
August 6, 2014 Filing 66 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Rhonda P. Ley re #64 Memorandum of Law, #65 Memorandum of Law, (Richter, Lillian)
August 6, 2014 Filing 65 MEMORANDUM OF LAW re #64 Memorandum of Law Letter Accompanying filed by Rhonda P. Ley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s), #4 Exhibit(s), #5 Exhibit(s), #6 Exhibit(s), #7 Exhibit(s), #8 Exhibit(s), #9 Exhibit(s), #10 Exhibit(s), #11 Exhibit(s), #12 Exhibit(s), #13 Exhibit(s), #14 Exhibit(s), #15 Exhibit(s), #16 Exhibit(s))(Richter, Lillian) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/6/2014: #17 Exhibit(s) 3) (jel, ). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/6/2014: #18 Exhibit(s) 4, #19 Exhibit(s) 5, #20 Exhibit(s) 6, #21 Exhibit(s) 7, #22 Exhibit(s) 8, #23 Exhibit(s) 9, #24 Exhibit(s) 10, #25 Exhibit(s) 11, #26 Exhibit(s) 12, #27 Exhibit(s) 13, #28 Exhibit(s) 14, #29 Exhibit(s) 15, #30 Exhibit(s) 16, #31 Exhibit(s) 17, #32 Exhibit(s) 18, #33 Exhibit(s) 19, #34 Exhibit(s) 20) (jel, ). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/6/2014: #35 Exhibit(s) 21, #36 Exhibit(s) 22, #37 Exhibit(s) 23, #38 Exhibit(s) 24, #39 Exhibit(s) 26, #40 Exhibit(s) 27, #41 Exhibit(s) 28, #42 Exhibit(s) 29, #43 Exhibit(s) 30) (jel, ). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/7/2014: #44 Exhibit(s) 31, #45 Exhibit(s) 32, #46 Exhibit(s) 33, #47 Exhibit(s) 34, #48 Exhibit(s) 35, #49 Exhibit(s) 36) (jel, ). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/7/2014: #50 Exhibit(s) 38 Part 1, #51 Exhibit(s) 38 Part 2, #52 Exhibit(s) 39, #53 Exhibit(s) 42, #54 Exhibit(s) 43, #55 Exhibit(s) 45, #56 Exhibit(s) 46, #57 Exhibit(s) 47, #58 Exhibit(s) 48, #59 Exhibit(s) 50, #60 Exhibit(s) 53, #61 Exhibit(s) 54, #62 Exhibit(s) 55, #63 Exhibit(s) 56, #64 Exhibit(s) 57, #65 Exhibit(s) 58, #66 Exhibit(s) 59, #67 Exhibit(s) 60, #68 Exhibit(s) 61, #69 Exhibit(s) 62, #70 Exhibit(s) 63, #71 Exhibit(s) 64, #72 Exhibit(s) 71) (jel, ).
August 6, 2014 Filing 64 MEMORANDUM OF LAW Supplemental Memorandum filed by Rhonda P. Ley. (Richter, Lillian)
August 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 63 STIPULATION/ORDER TO DETERMINE PETITION ON THE BASIS OF AFFIDAVITS AND DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE AND FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 8/1/2014. (jel, )
August 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 62 TEXT ONLY ORDER The court is in receipt of the parties' status reports detailing what they perceive as the issues standing in the way of a return on the petition. (Dkt. Nos. 59, 60.) In light of those submissions, the court approves the parties' joint proposed stipulation, which moots two of petitioner Rhonda Ley's pending motions. (Dkt. Nos. 2, 23.) Those motions, seeking: (1) a ruling that the petition will be determined on the basis of affidavits and documentary evidence subject to a protective order; and (2) a protective order limiting discovery, (Dkt. No. 23), are hereby DENIED as moot. The clerk will docket a so ordered copy of the stipulation in due course. Moreover, on the issue of supplemental briefing and filing additional evidence, including that which was exchanged by the parties on July 11, 2014, Ley is directed to file any supportive evidence, along with a supplemental memorandum of law addressing the to-be-filed-evidence no later than Wednesday, August 6, 2014 at 4:00 P.M. While the court would prefer a less lengthy submission, and encourages her to be as concise as possible, Ley's supplemental memorandum of law is limited to ten (10) pages in length. Respondent Novelis Corporation may thereafter file a supplemental response, with the same admonition regarding length, of no more than ten (10) pages by Friday, August 8, 2014 at 4:00 P.M. Also pending is Ley's request for "leave to file its reply to [Novelis'] opposition to the [p]etition for [i]njunction." (Dkt. No. 54.) Ley's request for leave to file a reply, (Dkt. No. 54), is DENIED. The arguments that Ley would raise in a properly filed reply can be articulated orally with the court at the return on the petition. The return on the petition is scheduled for Thursday, August 21, 2014 at 2:00 P.M. Finally, other than the filings specifically permitted by this Order, as set forth above, the parties shall seek leave of the court before any future filings. IT IS SO ORDERED. Issued by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 8/1/2014. (jel, )
August 1, 2014 Filing 61 LETTER BRIEF in Response to Respondent's July 31, 2014 Letter to Court by Rhonda P. Ley. (Richter, Lillian) (Letter brief 61 replaced on 8/1/2014 at request of counsel to make corrections) (lah).
July 31, 2014 Filing 60 STATUS REPORT Response to Judge Sharpe's Summary Order by Novelis Corporation. (Powell, Kurtis)
July 31, 2014 Filing 59 LETTER BRIEF concerning proposed joint stipulation by Rhonda P. Ley. (Leslie, Linda)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 58 SUMMARY ORDER - That the motion to intervene of John Tesoriero, Michael Malone, Richard Farrands, and Andrew Duschen (Dkt. No. 29) is DENIED. That the motion to intervene of Jason McDermott, William Robinson, Stephen Wheeler, and Brian Wyman (Dkt. No. 51) is DENIED. That the parties shall advise the court, within two (2) days of the date of this Summary Order, whether or not they still seek the court's approval of their joint proposed stipulation, and what, if any, further rulings are necessary on, among other things, Ley's motion to determine the petition on the basis of affidavits and documentary evidence subject to a protective order, (Dkt. No. 2), and Ley's motion for a protective order limiting discovery, (Dkt. No. 23). Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 7/29/2014. (jel, )
July 29, 2014 Filing 57 RESPONSE to Motion re #51 MOTION motion to intervene by order to show cause Petitioner's Response to Motion to Intervene by Novelis Employees Jason McDermott, William Robinson, Stephen Wheeler and Brian Wyman filed by Rhonda P. Ley. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of service)(Leslie, Linda)
July 29, 2014 Filing 56 Response to Respondent Novelis's Opposition to Petitioner's REquest to File Additional Briefing Letter Motion from Mattimore for Rhonda P. Ley requesting leave to file reply brief submitted to Judge Sharpe certificate of service. (Attachments: #1 certificate of service)(Mattimore, Mary)
July 29, 2014 Filing 55 RESPONSE in Opposition re #54 Letter Motion from Mattimore for Rhonda P. Ley requesting leave to file evidence,memo of law and reply submitted to Judge Sharpe filed by Novelis Corporation. (Powell, Kurtis)
July 28, 2014 Filing 54 Letter Motion from Mattimore for Rhonda P. Ley requesting leave to file evidence,memo of law and reply submitted to Judge Sharpe . (Attachments: #1 certificate of service)(Mattimore, Mary)
July 25, 2014 Filing 53 RESPONSE to Motion re #51 MOTION motion to intervene by order to show cause by Novelis Employees Jason McDermott, William Robinson, Stephen Wheeler and Brian Wyman filed by Novelis Corporation. (Powell, Kurtis)
July 25, 2014 Filing 52 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Jason McDermott, William Robinson, Stephen Wheeler, Brian Wyman re #51 MOTION motion to intervene by order to show cause (Wagner, Kenneth)
July 25, 2014 Filing 51 MOTION motion to intervene by order to show cause filed by Jason McDermott, William Robinson, Stephen Wheeler, Brian Wyman. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Declaration of Kenneth L. Wagner, #3 Declaration of Jason McDermott, #4 Declaration of William Robinson, #5 Declaration of Stephen Wheeler, #6 Declaration of Brian Wyman, #7 Proposed Answer) Motions referred to David E. Peebles. (Wagner, Kenneth)
July 25, 2014 Filing 50 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter A. Jones on behalf of Andrew Duschen, Richard Farrands, Michael W. Malone, John Tesoriero (Jones, Peter)
July 25, 2014 Filing 49 AFFIDAVIT in Opposition re #29 MOTION Intervention MOTION to Intervene filed by Rhonda P. Ley. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 service)(Leslie, Linda)
July 24, 2014 Filing 48 RESPONSE to Motion re #29 MOTION Intervention MOTION to Intervene filed by Novelis Corporation. (Powell, Kurtis)
July 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 47 TEXT ONLY ORDER - Pending is the motion of proposed intervenors Richard Farrands, John Tesoriero, Michael W. Malone, and Andrew Duschen seeking permission to supplement the record on their motion to intervene. (Dkt. No. 44.) It is not clear to the court whether proposed intervenors seek to file additional documents in support of their motion to intervene or they simply want to inform the court that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) granted their similar request to intervene in the administrative proceeding. (Id.) Petitioner Rhonda P. Ley, Regional Director of the Third Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board, opposes the request, claiming that it "is improper at this juncture." (Dkt. No. 46.) Ley argues that, because the motion to intervene has not been granted, proposed intervenors "have no standing to file documents." (Id. at 1.) She also advises the court that she has appealed the ALJs ruling with respect to intervention, which renders the court's consideration of the ALJ's ruling premature. (Id.) Finally, Ley asserts "that the status of a party in the administrative proceeding has no bearing on whether that party is entitled to intervene in the federal district court," as evidenced by her erroneous contention that the court "denied the Unions motion to intervene in the instant proceeding." (Id. at 1-2.) It is noted that the Union did not seek to intervene, but, instead, sought leave to appear as amicus curiae. (Dkt. No. 8.) While the court appreciates Leys efforts, it is fully aware that the ALJ's ruling is in no way binding on it. That is not to say, however, that the fact that the ALJ granted an application to intervene or its reasoning for so ruling is entirely irrelevant to the motion to intervene pending before this court. Moreover, and for similar reasons, the fact that Ley has appealed the ALJ does not render the ALJ's ruling useless from the perspective of this court. Accordingly, because the request pertains to the record before the court on their motion to intervene and the court considers the proposed information relevant and potentially helpful to the court, the request of proposed intervenors is granted. If proposed intervenors seek to file documents consistent with their letter motion, they are directed do so immediately. IT IS SO ORDERED. Issued by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 7/23/2014. (jel, )
July 22, 2014 Filing 46 RESPONSE in Opposition re #44 MOTION for Leave to File Documents to Supplement the Record filed by Rhonda P. Ley. (Richter, Lillian)
July 22, 2014 Filing 45 NOTICE of Appearance by Lillian Richter on behalf of Rhonda P. Ley (Richter, Lillian)
July 21, 2014 Filing 44 MOTION for Leave to File Documents to Supplement the Record filed by Andrew Duschen. Motions referred to David E. Peebles. (Hendry, Tyler)
July 17, 2014 Filing 43 AMENDED APPENDIX OF EXHIBITS by Novelis Corporation. Amendment to #37 Statement of Material Facts,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Amended Appendix. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 1 - Ascenzi, Cheryl Declaration, #2 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 2 - BAUM, Scott Declaration, #3 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 3 - Bell, Fiona Declaration, #4 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 4 - BENTON, George Declaration, #5 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 5 - BOUCHARD, David Declaration, #6 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 6 - BRO, JASON Declaration, #7 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 7 - BROWN, Scott Declaration, #8 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 8 - BUGOW, John Declaration, #9 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 9 - CALTABIANO, Mark Declaration, #10 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 10 - CARTIER Dan Declaration, #11 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 11 - DARLING Rob Declaration, #12 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 12 - DEFOREST Alan Declaration, #13 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 13 - DENO, Mike Declaration, #14 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 14 - DEXTER, Jason Declaration, #15 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 15 - DOMICOLO, Dave Declaration, #16 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 16 - DUSCHEN, Andy Declaration, #17 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 17 - DUSCHEN, Dave Declaration, #18 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 18 - DUSCHEN, Stephen Declaration, #19 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 19 - FARRANDS, Richard Declaration, #20 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 20 - FORMOZA, Craig Declaration, #21 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 21 - GORDON, DUANE Declaration, #22 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 22 - GRANBOIS, TOM Declaration, #23 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 23 - GRANT, Jim Declaration, #24 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 24 - HAGER, Verrick Declaration, #25 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 25 - HUNTER, Darrel Declaration, #26 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 26 - KIMBALL, Kyle Declaration, #27 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 27 - LACLAIR, Lewis Declaration, #28 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 28 - MALONE, Mike Declaration, #29 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 29 - NEVILLS, Robert Declaration, #30 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 30 - PRITCHARD, Justin Declaration, #31 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 31 - PROSSER, Jeremy Declaration, #32 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 32 - QUINN, Andy Declaration, #33 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 33 - RAYMOND, Mark Declaration, #34 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 34 - RUDES, Greg Declaration, #35 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 35 - SHEFTIC, PETER Declaration, #36 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 36- SHELDON, Mike Declaration, #37 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 37 - SMITH, Chris Declaration, #38 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 38 - SOMERS, Mike Declaration, #39 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 39 - STORMS, Jon Declaration, #40 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 40 - SWEET, Scott Declaration, #41 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 41 - SWEETING, Robert Declaration, #42 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 42- TAYLOR, DAN Declaration, #43 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 43 - TAORMINA, Mark Declaration, #44 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 44 - VICKERY, Jason Declaration, #45 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 45 - WELLING, Zach Declaration, #46 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 46 - WELLS, Tom Declaration, #47 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 47 - WHITCOMB, John Declaration, #48 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 48 - WHITE, Dean Declaration, #49 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 49 - WILLIAMS, Frank Declaration, #50 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 50 - WISE, Rob Declaration, #51 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 51 - ZYCH, Fred Declaration, #52 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 52 - Collection of employee sworn statements, #53 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 53 - Collection of employee sworn statements, #54 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 54 - Collection of employee sworn statements, #55 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 55 - Collection of employee sworn statements, #56 Exhibit(s) CONFIDENTIAL Exhibit 56 - Collection of Employee Sworn Statements, #57 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 57 - BNA - UNITE HERE Picks Hilton, #58 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 58 - BNA - Unions Turning Away from NLRB, #59 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 59 - WSJ - The Outlook Not-So-Big Labor, #60 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 60 - Labor Board asks novelis to negotiate, #61 Exhibit(s) Exhibit 61 - Petition for Injunction Case 1_13_mc_00064)(Powell, Kurtis) Modified on 7/18/2014 (jel, ).
July 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 42 LETTER/ORDER granting respondent's #41 letter requesting to file an amended appendix of exhibits and Exhibit A to the Declaration of Chris Smith. The submissions are to be filed on or before Monday, July 21, 2014. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 7/17/2014. (jel, )
July 16, 2014 Filing 41 Letter Motion from Edward G. Melvin, Esq. for Novelis Corporation requesting Leave to file an Amended Appendix of Exhibits submitted to Judge Sharpe . (Melvin, Edward)
July 14, 2014 Filing 40 EXHIBIT S: CD Exhibit in support of the #37 Statement of Material Facts- Attachment 37 Declaration of Chris Smith. Exhibit not available electronically. Exhibit filed traditionally and maintained in the Clerk's Office. (mc)
July 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 39 TEXT ONLY ORDER In addition to the outstanding petition seeking an injunction pursuant to 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act, (Dkt. No. 1), and the motion of petitioner Rhonda P. Ley, Regional Director of the Third Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board, seeking a ruling as to what evidence the court will consider in disposing of the petition as well as a protective order, (Dkt. Nos. 2-3), Ley has filed a motion for a protective order limiting discovery, (Dkt. No. 23), and a joint letter request seeking approval of a stipulation that pertains to the protective order issues, (Dkt. No. 38). Also pending is the motion of proposed intervenors Andrew Duschen, Richard Farrands, Michael W. Malone, and John Tesoriero seeking to intervene, which was brought by order to show cause. (Dkt. No. 29.) In light of the foregoing, and the impact that the motion to intervene may have upon other unresolved issues, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) Ley and respondent Novelis Corporation may file responsive papers to the motion to intervene no later than 12:00 P.M. on Friday, July 25, 2014 in full compliance with the Local Rules and Rules of Civil Procedure; (2) no reply may be filed by the proposed intervenors without prior leave of the court; and (3) the July 17, 2014 return date scheduled by this courts June 27, 2014 order is adjourned without date. IT IS SO ORDERED. Issued by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 7/14/2014. (jel, )
July 11, 2014 Filing 38 Letter Request Letter Motion from Petitioner for Rhonda P. Ley requesting Proposed Stipulation to Determine Petition On the Basis of Affidavits And Documentary Evidence and For A Protective Order submitted to Judge Sharpe . (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order/Judgment relating to Dck. nos. 2, 3, 23 and 34)(Leslie, Linda)
July 11, 2014 Filing 37 STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS re #1 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Appendix of Exhibits ISO Dkt. #35 & #36 filed by Novelis Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Cheryl Ascenzi, #2 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Scott Baum, #3 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Fiona Bell, #4 Exhibit(s) Declaration of George Benton, #5 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Dave Bouchard, #6 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Jason Bro, #7 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Scott Brown, #8 Exhibit(s) Declaration of John Bugow, #9 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Mark Caltabiano, #10 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Dan Cartier, #11 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Rob Darling, #12 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Alan DeForest, #13 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Mike Deno, #14 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Jason Dexter, #15 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Dave Domicolo, #16 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Andy Duschen, #17 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Dave Duschen, #18 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Stephen Duschen, #19 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Richard Farrands, #20 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Craig Formoza, #21 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Duane Gordon, #22 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Tom Granbois, #23 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Jim Grant, #24 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Verrick Hager, #25 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Darrel Hunter, #26 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Kyle Kimball, #27 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Lewis LaClair, #28 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Mike Malone, #29 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Robert Nevills, #30 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Justin Pritchard, #31 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Jeremy Prosser, #32 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Andy Quinn, #33 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Mark Raymond, #34 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Greg Rudes, #35 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Peter Sheftic, #36 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Mike Sheldon, #37 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Chris Smith, #38 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Mike Somers, #39 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Jon Storms, #40 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Scott Sweet, #41 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Robert Sweeting, #42 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Dan Taylor, #43 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Mark Taormina, #44 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Jason Vickery, #45 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Zach Welling, #46 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Tom Wells, #47 Exhibit(s) Declaration of John Whitcomb, #48 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Dean White, #49 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Frank Williams, #50 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Rob Wise, #51 Exhibit(s) Declaration of Fred Zych, #52 Exhibit(s) Collection of Employee Sworn Statements Regarding Union Misrepresentations Regarding Authorization Cards, #53 Exhibit(s) Collection of Employee Sworn Statements Regarding Previous Negative Experiences with Unions, #54 Exhibit(s) Collection of Employee Sworn Statements Regarding Employee Initiated Efforts Against Unionization, #55 Motion to Vacate pursuant to CPL Collection of Employee Sworn Statements Regarding Unions Damaging Behavior During Campaign, #56 Exhibit(s) Collection of Employee Sworn Statements Regarding Absence of Implied Threats, #57 Exhibit(s) UNITE HERE Picks Hilton as Target for Hotel Workers Rising Campaign, Daily Lab. Rep. (BNA) No. 57, at B-1 (Mar. 3, 2005), #58 Exhibit(s) Unions Turning Away from NLRB Elections as Primary Way of Organizing, Raynor says, Daily Lab. Rep (BNA) No. 8, at C-3 (Jan. 12, 2006), #59 Exhibit(s) The Outlook: Not-So-Big Labor Enlists New Methods for Greater Leverage, by Timothy Aeppel, Wall St. J. (Aug. 29, #60 Exhibit(s) Labor Board Asks Novelis to Negotiate with Union without a New Vote (WSYR-TV news broadcast May 14, 2014, #61 Exhibit(s) Petition -Murphy v. Hogan Transports Inc., Case No. 1:13-mc-00064-GLS-RFT)(Powell, Kurtis)
July 11, 2014 Filing 36 STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS re #1 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction In Opposition to the National Labor Relations Board's Petition for Injunction Under Section 10(j) filed by Novelis Corporation. (Powell, Kurtis)
July 11, 2014 Filing 35 RESPONSE in Opposition re #1 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act, as Amended, 29 U.S.C. Section 160(j) filed by Novelis Corporation. (Powell, Kurtis)
July 11, 2014 Filing 34 RESPONSE in Opposition re #2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Novelis Corporation. (Powell, Kurtis)
July 11, 2014 Filing 33 Respondent Novelis ANSWER to Complaint 10(j) Petition by Novelis Corporation.(Powell, Kurtis)
July 10, 2014 Filing 32 NOTICE of Appearance by Tyler T. Hendry on behalf of Andrew Duschen, Richard Farrands, Michael W. Malone, John Tesoriero (Hendry, Tyler)
July 10, 2014 Filing 31 NOTICE of Appearance by Louis P. DiLorenzo on behalf of Andrew Duschen, Richard Farrands, Michael W. Malone, John Tesoriero (DiLorenzo, Louis)
July 10, 2014 Filing 30 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Andrew Duschen, Richard Farrands, Michael W. Malone, John Tesoriero re #29 MOTION Intervention MOTION to Intervene (Eron, Thomas)
July 10, 2014 Filing 29 MOTION Intervention , MOTION to Intervene filed by Andrew Duschen, Richard Farrands, Michael W. Malone, John Tesoriero. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Intervene, #2 Attorney Declaration with Exhibit, #3 Declaration of Richard Farrands, #4 Exhibit(s) to Declaration of Richard Farrands, #5 Declaration of John Tesoriero, #6 Declaration of Michael Malone, #7 Declaration of Andrew Duschen, #8 Answer of Intervenors to Petition for Injunction Under Section 10(j) of the NLRA) Motions referred to David E. Peebles. (Eron, Thomas)
July 10, 2014 Filing 28 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas G. Eron on behalf of Richard Farrands, John Tesoriero, Michael W. Malone, Andrew Duschen (Eron, Thomas)
July 10, 2014 Filing 27 LETTER BRIEF Reply to Respondent's Opposition #24 to Petitioner's Motion for Protective order limiting discovery by Rhonda P. Ley. (Leslie, Linda)
July 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 26 LETTER dated July 10, 2014 by Edward G. Melvin, Esq., and ORDER granting request to submit a 55 page memorandum of law in opposition. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 7/10/2014. (jel, )
July 10, 2014 Filing 25 RESPONSE to Motion re #1 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Letter Request to Submit Memorandum of Law in Opposition filed by Novelis Corporation. (Melvin, Edward)
July 10, 2014 Filing 24 RESPONSE in Opposition re #23 MOTION for Discovery Protective order limiting discovery letter request filed by Novelis Corporation. (Melvin, Edward)
July 9, 2014 Filing 23 MOTION for Discovery Protective order limiting discovery filed by Rhonda P. Ley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Memorandum of Law, #3 Proposed Order/Judgment) Motions referred to David E. Peebles. (Leslie, Linda)
July 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 22 TEXT ORDER granting #20 MOTION for Limited Admission Pro Hac Vice of Nicole Roberts and #21 MOTION for Limited Admission Pro Hac Vice of Linda M. Leslie on behalf of Rhonda P. Ley. Authorized by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 7/3/14. (cam, )
July 2, 2014 Filing 21 MOTION for Limited Admission Pro Hac Vice of Linda M. Leslie (Fee is waived) filed by Rhonda P. Ley. Motions referred to David E. Peebles. (Mattimore, Mary)
July 2, 2014 Filing 20 MOTION for Limited Admission Pro Hac Vice of Nicole Roberts (Fee is waived) filed by Rhonda P. Ley. Motions referred to David E. Peebles. (Mattimore, Mary) Modified on 7/2/2014 (emailed counsel for the E-filng Registration form(lah). (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/2/2014: #1 E-Filing Registration Form) (lah, ).
July 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 19 TEXT ORDER granting #13 Motion for Limited Admission Pro Hac Vice for Kenneth L. Dobkin, Esq.; granting #14 Motion for Limited Admission Pro Hac Vice for Kurtis A. Powell, Esq.; and granting #15 Motion for Limited Admission Pro Hac Vice for Robert T. Dumbacher, Esq. on behalf of Novelis Corporation. Authorized by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 7/2/14. (sal, )
July 2, 2014 Filing 18 LETTER/0RDER - The Union's motion requesting to appear amicus curiae and for the substantive relief requested in its motion was denied in its entirety. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 7/2/2014. (jel, )
July 2, 2014 CLERK'S CORRECTION OF DOCKET ENTRY. clerk deleted PHV motion, dkt. no. 22. The filing is the E-filing registration form to be associated with PHV motion, dkt. no. #20 . (lah)
July 1, 2014 Filing 17 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Rhonda P. Ley (Attachments: #1 Service of Summons)(Mattimore, Mary)
July 1, 2014 Filing 16 Letter Motion from James R. LaVaute for United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC requesting clarification regarding text order dated July 1, 2014 (Dkt. No. 12) submitted to Judge Gary L. Sharpe . (LaVaute, James)
July 1, 2014 Filing 15 MOTION for Limited Admission Pro Hac Vice of Robert T. Dumbacher Filing fee $100, receipt number 0206-2981738. filed by Novelis Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s), #4 Exhibit(s), #5 Exhibit(s), #6 Proposed Order/Judgment) Motions referred to David E. Peebles. (Melvin, Edward)
July 1, 2014 Filing 14 MOTION for Limited Admission Pro Hac Vice of Kurtis A. Powell Filing fee $100, receipt number 0206-2981707. filed by Novelis Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s), #4 Exhibit(s), #5 Exhibit(s), #6 Proposed Order/Judgment) Motions referred to David E. Peebles. (Melvin, Edward)
July 1, 2014 Filing 13 MOTION for Limited Admission Pro Hac Vice of Kenneth L. Dobkin Filing fee $100, receipt number 0206-2981629. filed by Novelis Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s), #4 Exhibit(s), #5 Exhibit(s), #6 Proposed Order/Judgment) Motions referred to David E. Peebles. (Melvin, Edward)
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 12 TEXT ONLY ORDER - Upon review of United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC's application for an order to show cause seeking leave to appear as amicus curiae (Dkt. No. 8), that motion is DENIED. Issued by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 7/1/2014. (jel, )
June 30, 2014 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Edward G. Melvin on behalf of Novelis Corporation (Melvin, Edward)
June 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #4 Letter Motion for Rhonda P. Ley requesting to file an oversize memorandum of law. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 6/27/2014. (jel, )
June 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - IT IS ORDERED that Respondent file an answer to the allegations of said petition, and papers responding to Petitioner's motion to determine the petition on the basis of affidavits and documentary evidence subject to a protective order with the Clerk of this Court, and serve copies thereof upon Petitioner at her office located at National Labor Relations Board, Third Region, Niagara Center Building, Suite 630, 130 South Elmwood Avenue, Buffalo, New York, 14202, on or before the 11th day of July, 2014, at 5:00 P.M. E.S.T.; and, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent appear the 17th day of July, 2014, at 11:00 A.M. E.S.T. at the U.S. Courthouse, 445 Broadway, Albany, New York, 12207, in Courtroom No. 6; or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard, and then and there show cause, if any there be, why, pending the final disposition of the matters involved herein before the National Labor Relations Board, a preliminary injunction should not issue, enjoining and restraining Respondent, its representatives, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all individuals acting in concert or participation with them, as prayed in the aforesaid petition. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that service of a copy of this Order, together with a copy of the petition and exhibits upon which it is issued, be forthwith made upon Respondent by 4:00 p.m. on July 2, 2014 and that proof of service be filed herein. Response to Motion due by 7/11/2014. Motion Hearing set for 7/17/2014 at 11:00 AM in Albany before Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 6/27/2014. (jel, )
June 26, 2014 Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear as Amicus Curiae by Order to Show Cause filed by United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support of Union's Motion for Leave to Appear as Amicus Curiae, #2 Affidavit of James R. LaVaute) Motions referred to David E. Peebles. (LaVaute, James)
June 25, 2014 Filing 7 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 10/2/2014 at 9:30 AM in Syracuse before Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 9/25/2014. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (lah)
June 25, 2014 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Novelis Corporation. (lah)
June 25, 2014 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Rhonda P. Ley. (lah)
June 25, 2014 Filing 4 Letter Motion for Rhonda P. Ley requesting to file an oversize memorandum of law submitted to Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe. (lah)
June 25, 2014 Filing 3 PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Rhonda P. Ley. (lah)
June 25, 2014 Filing 2 MOTION to Determine Injunction Petition on the Basis of Affidavits and Documentary Evidence Subject to a Protective Order by Rhonda P. Ley. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Mary R. Mattimore, Esq., #2 Memorandum of Law, #3 Proposed Order)(lah)
June 25, 2014 Filing 1 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Rhonda P. Ley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Declaration of Rhonda Ley in Support of Petition, #3 Memorandum of Law, #4 Proposed Order to Show Cause, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) ** Filing Fee waived. Petitioner government agency.(lah)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ley v. Novelis Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rhonda P. Ley
Represented By: Linda M. Leslie
Represented By: Mary Elizabeth Mattimore
Represented By: Nicole Roberts
Represented By: Lillian Richter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Novelis Corporation
Represented By: Kenneth L. Dobkin
Represented By: Kurtis A. Powell
Represented By: Robert T. Dumbacher
Represented By: Edward G. Melvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor: Richard Farrands
Represented By: Louis P. DiLorenzo
Represented By: Peter A. Jones
Represented By: Thomas G. Eron
Represented By: Tyler T. Hendry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor: John Tesoriero
Represented By: Louis P. DiLorenzo
Represented By: Peter A. Jones
Represented By: Thomas G. Eron
Represented By: Tyler T. Hendry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor: Michael W. Malone
Represented By: Louis P. DiLorenzo
Represented By: Peter A. Jones
Represented By: Thomas G. Eron
Represented By: Tyler T. Hendry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor: Andrew Duschen
Represented By: Tyler T. Hendry
Represented By: Louis P. DiLorenzo
Represented By: Peter A. Jones
Represented By: Thomas G. Eron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor: Jason McDermott
Represented By: Kenneth L. Wagner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor: William Robinson
Represented By: Kenneth L. Wagner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor: Stephen Wheeler
Represented By: Kenneth L. Wagner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor: Brian Wyman
Represented By: Kenneth L. Wagner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?