Welsh v. Rome Memorial Hospital, Inc.
Plaintiff: Geoffrey D. Welsh
Defendant: Rome Memorial Hospital, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2014cv01423
Filed: November 24, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Utica Office
County: Oneida
Presiding Judge: Andrew T. Baxter
Presiding Judge: David N. Hurd
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting defendants' 23 Motion for Summary Judgment. The complaint is dismissed. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 11/8/16. (sfp, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Welsh v. Rome Memorial Hospital, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Geoffrey D. Welsh
Represented By: James D. Hartt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rome Memorial Hospital, Inc.
Represented By: Robert J. Thorpe
Represented By: Robert C. Whitaker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?