Sahin v. United States of America

Defendant: United States of America
Plaintiff: Bayram Sahin
Case Number: 8:2013cv00358
Filed: March 30, 2013
Court: New York Northern District Court
Office: Plattsburgh Office
County: Franklin
Presiding Judge: Gary L. Sharpe
Referring Judge: Randolph F. Treece
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28:1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 22, 2014 7 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Randolph F. Treece's March 12, 2014 5 Report-Recommendation and Order is ADOPTED. It is further ORDERED that Sahin's 1 petition for a writ of error coram nobis is DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 5/22/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Report Recommendation of Judge Treece) (dpk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sahin v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bayram Sahin
Represented By: Raymond G. Lahoud
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.