Abreu v. Travers et al
| Carlos Abreu |
| Travers, Lashway, Kornigsmann, Rock, Schroyer, Prack, Bellinier, Bellamy, Smith, Rabideau, Otis, Grinbergs, Marlow, White, Woodward, Fischer, J. Whitford, K. Wilson, W. Tabb, D. Bilow, Forbes, F. Jarvis, S. Santamore, J. Cromp, T. Zernia, P. Gokey, M. Lira, Greenizen, N. Lipka, Patterson, P. Williams, L. Tuper, M. Sisto, B. Grant, T. Dunning, D. Richter, T. Phillips, E. Marshall, J. Laramay, C.O. Gokey, R. Isobella, Spinner, T. Quinn, J. Hungerford, E. Bell, Uhler, Garland, G. Waterson, J. Oropallo, J. Evans, M. Bosco, Tim Kemp and Nason |
| 9:2015cv00540 |
| May 1, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Sullivan |
| Andrew T. Baxter |
| Mae A. D'Agostino |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice and the Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly, all of the above pursuant to the Orders of the Honorable Judge Mae A. DAgostino, dated the 19th day of July, 2019 and the 28th day of August, 2019. (Copy served via regular mail). (rep)
|
|
Filing
21
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that the following claims survive sua sponte review and require a response: (1) the Eighth Amendment medical indifference claims against defendants Travers, Marlow, Lashway, Waterson, Fischer, Rock, Schroyer, Kornigsmann , Grinbergs, Smith, Rabideau, Otis, Bellnier, and Uhler; (2) the Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against defendants Patterson, Marshall, Lipka, Tuper, Whitford, Greenizen, Otis, Rock, Zernia, Phillips, Grant, Dunning, Richter, and Sisto; (3) the Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claims against defendants Williams, Bilow, Oropallo, and Greenizen; (4) the Eighth Amendment restricted diet claims against defendants Rock, Kornigsmann, Fischer, Prack, Bellnier, Schroyer, Otis, Lashway , Uhler, Travers, and Lira; and (5) the First Amendment retaliation claims against defendants Travers, Lashway, Wilson, Gokey, and Phillips. ORDERED that all remaining claims are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. ORDERED the Clerk shall issue summonses for defendants Travers, Marlow, Lashway, Waterson, Fischer, Rock, Schroyer, Kornigsmann, Grinbergs, Smith, Rabideau, Otis, Bellnier, Greenizen, Uhle r, Patterson, Marshall, Lipka, Tuper, Whitford, Zernia, Grant, Dunning, Richter, Sisto, Williams, Bilow, Oropallo, Prack, Lira, Wilson, Gokey, and Phillips and forward them to plaintiff. It is plaintiff's responsibility to immediately serve the named defendants with a summons and a copy of his complaint in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk shall forward a copy of the summons and complaint by mail to the Office of the New York State Attorney General, together wi th a copy of this Decision and Order. ORDERED that a response to the complaint be filed by the defendants Travers,Marlow, Lashway, Waterson, Fischer, Rock, Schroyer, Kornigsmann, Grinbergs, Smith, Rabideau, Otis, Bellnier, Greenizen, Uhler, Patter son, Marshall, Lipka, Tuper, Whitford, Zernia, Grant, Dunning, Richter, Sisto, Williams, Bilow, Oropallo, Prack, Lira, Wilson, Gokey, and Phillips, or their counsel, as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ORDERED that Bell, Bellam y, Bosco, Cromp, Evans, Forbes, Garland, Gonzalez, Hungerford, Jarvis, Kemp, Laramay, Santamore, Tabb, White, Woodward, Isobella, Nason, Quinn, and Spinner are DISMISSED without prejudice as defendants to this action. ORDERED that plaintiff may sub mit a motion requesting service of process by the U.S. Marshal in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3) to the limited extent set forth above. The Clerk shall send plaintiff thirty-three blank USM-285 Forms for his use should he cho ose to request such service. As a courtesy, the Clerk shall also send plaintiff one copy of his complaint for his use in making additional copies. ORDERED that upon receipt from the Clerk of plaintiff's payment of the service fee and the docu ments required for service, the U.S. Marshal shall attempt to serve the summons and complaint upon the remaining defendants in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ORDERED that, if plaintiff requests service by the U.S. Marshal, he must comply with any additional requests from the U.S. Marshal for documents that are necessary to effectuate service, and must provide payment in advance to the U.S. Marshal for any subsequent service attempt if the original attempt to serve any defendant is unsuccessful. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 10/20/16. (served with forms and copies on plaintiff by regular mail as directed)(alh, )
|
|
Filing
14
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Dkt. No. 13 ) is DENIED in all respects. ORDERED that this action shall be DISMISSED without prejudice, without further order of the Court, if plaintiff fails to pay the full filing fee of three hundred fifty dollars ($350.00) within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Decision and Order. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 4/28/16. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
