23-94th St. Grocery Corp. et al v. New York City Board of Health et al
| 23-94th St. Grocery Corp., Kissena Blvd. Convenience Store, Inc., New York Association of Convenience Stores, New York State Association Of Service Stations and Repairs Shops, Inc., Lorillard Tobacco Company, Philip Morris USA Inc. and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Inc. |
| New York City Board of Health, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City Department of Consumer Affairs, Thomas Farley and Jonathan Mintz |
| 1:2010cv04392 |
| June 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Jed S. Rakoff |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
OPINION AND ORDER re: 46 FIRST MOTION for Summary Judgment. 22 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. For reasons further set forth in said Order, the Court concludes that Art 181.19 is a requirement with respect to promotion of cigarettes that is fo rbidden by section 1334(b) of the Labeling Act. The Court hereby grants plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, denies defendants' motion for summary judgment, and declares Article 181.19 null and void. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter final judgment forthwith in accordance with this Opinion and to close the documents numbered 22 and 46 on the docket of this case. (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 12/29/10) (db)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
