Lederman et al v. New York City Department of Parks and Recreation et al
| Robert Lederman and Jack Nesbitt |
| New York City Department of Parks and Recreation, Adrian Benepe, City of New York and Michael Bloomberg |
| 1:2010cv04800 |
| June 18, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Unassigned |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to terminate the motion located at Doc. No. 34 and to close this case. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 9/30/2012) (ago)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated above, Plaintiffs' motions for a preliminary injunction are denied. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT, by August 5, 2010, the parties shall jointly submit to the Court a proposed case management plan and scheduling order. A template for the order is available at http://www1.nysd.uscourts.gov/judge_info.php?id=99. The proposed case management plan should be emailed to my chambers at the following email address: sullivannysdchambers@nysd.uscourts.gov. Please consult my Individual Rules with respect to communications with chambers and related matters. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 7/16/2010) (jpo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
