Lessoff v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad

Defendant: Metro-North Commuter Railroad
Plaintiff: David Lessoff
Case Number: 1:2011cv09649
Filed: December 29, 2011
Court: New York Southern District Court
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Westchester
Presiding Judge: John G. Koeltl
Nature of Suit: Federal Employers Liability
Cause of Action: 45:51
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 10, 2014 55 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER: re: 47 MOTION for New Trial. filed by David Lessoff: For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs motion is DENIED in its entirety. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 04/10/2014) (jcs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lessoff v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Metro-North Commuter Railroad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Lessoff
Represented By: Philip J. Dinhofer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.