Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Ullah et al
||Board of Managers of the Columbia Condominium, John Doe, Asset Acceptance LLC, Internal Revenue Service and Farrin Ullah
||Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
||January 22, 2013
||New York Southern District Court
||Foley Square Office
||XX Out of State
||J. Paul Oetken
|Nature of Suit:
||Real Property: Foreclosure
|Cause of Action:
||28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 6, 2014
OPINION AND ORDER re: 22 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , failure to state a claim, and failure to join a party filed by Farrin Ullah. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint is GRANTED for lack of standing. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at Docket No. 22 and close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 2/06/2014) (ama)
|May 21, 2014
OPINION AND ORDER re: 33 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 31 Memorandum & Opinion, 32 Clerk's Judgment filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. For the foregoing reasons, Wells Fargo's motion for reconsideration is denied, except that r econsideration is granted to the extent that leave to file an amended complaint is granted. Wells Fargo may file an amended complaint within thirty days. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at Docket No. 33. The Clerk shall reopen this case and permit Wells Fargo to file an amended complaint within 30 days. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 5/21/2014) (lmb)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.