Martinez v. Heffard

Plaintiff: Freddy Martinez
Defendant: Heffard
Case Number: 1:2013cv01854
Filed: March 19, 2013
Court: New York Southern District Court
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Orange
Presiding Judge: Loretta A. Preska
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 21, 2015 37 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER: As Martinez failed to file objections, the Court reviewed Judge Netburn's Reports for clear error and found none. Accordingly, the Reports are hereby ADOPTED and Martinez's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 4/21/2015) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (kko)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martinez v. Heffard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Freddy Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Heffard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.