National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Diverse Staffing, Inc.
| National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA |
| Diverse Staffing, Inc. |
| 1:2013cv01954 |
| March 22, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Kevin Nathaniel Fox |
| Andrew L. Carter |
| Contract: Other |
| 09 U.S.C. ยง 4 Federal Arbitration Act |
| None |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Diverse Staffing, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Christian Ferlazzo |
| Represented By: | Evan L Smoak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Diverse Staffing, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
