Crothers v. Colvin
||Carolyn W. Colvin
||June 13, 2013
||New York Southern District Court
||Foley Square Office
||Jesse M. Furman
|Nature of Suit:
||Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
|Cause of Action:
||42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 3, 2015
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. For the foregoing reasons, I recommend that: (1) the plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings, Docket Entry No. 12, be granted, in part, and the case remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings, pursua nt to Sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); and (2) the defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings, Docket Entry No. 22, be denied. re: 22 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings . filed by Carolyn W. Colvin, 12 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings . filed by Anthony Crothers. Objections to R&R due by 2/20/2015. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 2/3/2015) (rjm).
|March 16, 2015
ORDER adopting 30 Report and Recommendations, denying 22 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Carolyn W. Colvin, granting in part denying in part 12 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Anthony Crothers. Defendan t's motion, Dkt. 22, is DENIED. Plaintiff's motion, Dkt. 12, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment in Plaintiff's favor and to terminate the case. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 3/16/2015) (mro)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.