In Re Keurig K-Cup Indirect Purchaser Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: Shirley Schroeder, Constance Werthe, Patricia J. Nelson, Lorie Rehma, Jonna Dugan, Mary Hudson, Patricia Hall, Brier Miller Minor, Amy Gray and Armando Herrera
Defendant: Keurig Green Mountain Inc. and Keurig, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2014cv04391
Filed: June 18, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Vernon S. Broderick
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 134 ORDER granting (1333) Letter Motion to Seal in case 1:14-md-02542-VSB-SLC. APPLICATION GRANTED. The IPPs shall file their response with the redactions proposed in Doc. 1339. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 11/7/2022) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-md-02542-VSB-SLC, 1:14-cv-04391-VSB (kv)
June 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 111 ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: 1. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms have the same meanings as defined in the Agreement. 2. I have jurisdiction over the subject matter of these Actions and over all pa rties to the Actions, including all Settlement Class Members. 3. The Preliminary Approval Order outlined the form and methods by which Plaintiffs would provide the Settlement Class with notice of the Settlement, the fairness hearing, and related matt ers. (Doc. 1216.) I incorporate by reference my previous findings from this Order. The Court finds that the notice provisions of the Class Action Fairness Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1715, were fully discharged. The Preliminary Approval Order, dated Decemb er 16, 2020, certified the following Settlement Class solely for purposes of settlement: as further set forth herein. I confirm that certification of the Settlement Class in the Preliminary Approval Order was without prejudice to, or waiver of the r ights of, Keurig to contest certification of any other class proposed in In re Keurig Green Mountain Single Serve Coffee Antitrust Litigation, 14-md-2542, ("The Multi-District Litigation"), or in any other proceeding, and that no plaintiff may cite or refer to the Court's approval of the Indirect Purchaser Settlement Class as persuasive or binding authority with respect to any motion to certify any other class in the Multi-District Litigation, or any other proceeding. I find that this settlement was procedurally fair and attained following an extensive investigation of the facts. It resulted from vigorous arm's-length negotiations aided by an experienced mediator, Judge Farnan, which negotiations were undertaken in good faith by counsel with significant experience litigating antitrust class actions. I incorporate by reference my findings from the Preliminary Approval Order, (Doc. 1216), as well as the findings I made at the June 4, 2021 fairness hearing. The Action s are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. Keurig releases the Releasing Parties and Settlement Class Counsel from any and all claims that arise out of or relate in any way to the institution, prosecution, or settlement of the Released Claims against Keurig, as described in the Agreement. In the event that the parties rescind the Agreement in accordance with its terms,the Agreement and all related proceedings shall be null and void, except as provided in theAgreement, without prej udice to the status quo and rights of the parties. In such event, thecertification of the Settlement Class shall become null and void and shall not be used or referredto for any further purpose in the Actions or in any other action or proceeding, and shall notprejudice any party in arguing for or against the contested class certification in the Actions or inany other proceeding. Further in the event that the parties rescind the Agreement in accordance with its terms, any and all amounts then con stituting the Settlement Fund (including all income earned thereon but excluding any taxes already paid on such income), less the actual costs of notice and reasonable administration costs incurred prior to such rescission not to exceed the sum of &# 036;625,000, shall be returned to the Defendant pursuant to the terms of the Agreement. In the event that the parties rescind the Agreement in accordance with its terms, or if this Order Final Judgment is reversed or modified on appeal, then any awar d of fees and/or expenses is no longer payable and, if any portion of the awarded fees and/or expenses has already been paid from the Settlement Fund, each Settlement Class Counsel law firm shall refund to the Defendant those fees and/or expenses pai d to that Settlement Class Counsel law firm pursuant to the terms of the Agreement. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 6/7/2021) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-md-02542-VSB-SLC, 1:14-cv-04391-VSB (kv) Transmission to Finance Unit (Cashiers) for processing.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re Keurig K-Cup Indirect Purchaser Antitrust Litigation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shirley Schroeder
Represented By: Thomas H. Burt
Represented By: Francis M Gregorek
Represented By: Frederick T. Isquith
Represented By: Marisa C. Livesay
Represented By: Betsy Carol Manifold
Represented By: Rachele R Rickert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Constance Werthe
Represented By: Thomas H. Burt
Represented By: Francis M Gregorek
Represented By: Frederick T. Isquith
Represented By: Marisa C. Livesay
Represented By: Betsy Carol Manifold
Represented By: Rachele R Rickert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia J. Nelson
Represented By: Thomas H. Burt
Represented By: Frederick T. Isquith
Represented By: Rachele R Rickert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lorie Rehma
Represented By: Thomas H. Burt
Represented By: Frederick T. Isquith
Represented By: Rachele R Rickert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonna Dugan
Represented By: Thomas H. Burt
Represented By: Frederick T. Isquith
Represented By: Rachele R Rickert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Hudson
Represented By: Thomas H. Burt
Represented By: Frederick T. Isquith
Represented By: Rachele R Rickert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia Hall
Represented By: Thomas H. Burt
Represented By: Frederick T. Isquith
Represented By: Rachele R Rickert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brier Miller Minor
Represented By: Frederick T. Isquith
Represented By: Rachele R Rickert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy Gray
Represented By: Thomas H. Burt
Represented By: Francis M Gregorek
Represented By: Frederick T. Isquith
Represented By: Marisa C. Livesay
Represented By: Betsy Carol Manifold
Represented By: Rachele R Rickert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Armando Herrera
Represented By: Thomas H. Burt
Represented By: Francis M Gregorek
Represented By: Frederick T. Isquith
Represented By: Marisa C. Livesay
Represented By: Betsy Carol Manifold
Represented By: Rachele R Rickert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Keurig Green Mountain Inc.
Represented By: George Stephen Cary
Represented By: George Stephen Cary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Keurig, Inc.
Represented By: George Stephen Cary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?