Thomas v. Grunberg 77 LLC et al
Plaintiff: Terrell Thomas
Defendant: Grunberg 77 LLC and 359 Columbus Avenue, LLC
Case Number: 1:2015cv01925
Filed: March 13, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: George B. Daniels
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1367
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 84 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER adopting 83 Report and Recommendations re: 42 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Grunberg 77 LLC, 49 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by 359 Columbus Avenue, LLC: Plaintiff, a wheelchair user, filed thi s action on March 13, 2015 asserting claims under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. § 12181, the New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y.C. Admin. Code §§ 8-101, N.Y. Civ. Rights Law §§ ; 40-c and 40-d, and common law negligence, all arising out of the alleged inaccessibility of premises known as Isabella's Restaurant ("Isabella's"). ("Complaint," ECF No. 1.) This Court had original jurisdiction over th e ADA claim (see 28 §§ U.S.C. 1331, 1343) and supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's related state and local claims (see 28 U.S.C. § 1367). Defendants, owner of the property ("Owner") and tenant ("Tenant") leasing the property and operating Isabella's, answered denying Plaintiff's allegations. (Answers, ECF 11, 16.) Additionally, Owner filed cross-claims against Tenant for contribution and/or indemnification. (Crossclaim Ans., ECF 19.) Both O wner and Tenant filed summary judgement motions against each other with respect to the cross-claims. (ECF Nos. 42, 49.) Before this Court is Magistrate Judge Moses's Report and Recommendation ("Report," ECF No. 83) recommending that th is Court dismiss Plaintiff's complaint brought under the ADA with prejudice, as moot, and dismiss all remaining claims and cross-claims brought under state and local law, without prejudice to refile in state court. This Court adopts the Report i n its entirety. Count I of Plaintiff's Complaint, brought under the ADA, is dismissed with prejudice as moot. All remaining claims and cross-claims in this action, brought under state and local law, are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at ECF Nos. 42 and 49, and this case. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 7/28/2017) (jwh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas v. Grunberg 77 LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terrell Thomas
Represented By: Adam Saul Hanski
Represented By: Robert Gerald Hanski
Represented By: Glen Howard Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Grunberg 77 LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 359 Columbus Avenue, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?