A.W. v. New York City Department of Education
| A.W. and T.W. |
| New York City Department of Education |
| 1:2015cv03534 |
| May 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Vernon S. Broderick |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1401 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
OPINION & ORDER: re: 21 CROSS MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by New York City Department of Education, 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by A.W. For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiffs' motion for summ ary judgment is GRANTED, and Defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Defendant is hereby ordered to reimburse Plaintiffs for tuition paid to the Aaron School in the amount of $8,000 upon submission of proof of payment an d to pay the remaining tuition balance directly to the Aaron School for the 2012-2013 school year, the total amount of tuition reimbursement and direct payment not to exceed $49,925. The parties are directed to confer in an effort to reach an agreement concerning attorneys' fees. If no agreement is reached, Plaintiffs shall submit a fee application on or before March 30, 2018. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions located at docket numbers 18 and 21, and as further set forth in this order. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 2/21/2018) (ap) Modified on 2/21/2018 (ap).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
