Lebron v. Colvin

Lebron v. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Cynthia Oneida Lebron
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	7:2014cv05921
Filed:	July 30, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	White Plains Office
County:	Orange
Presiding Judge:	Cathy Seibel
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 18, 2018	Filing 20 ORDER adopting 12 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Cynthia Oneida Lebron, 14 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Carolyn W. Colvin, 17 Report and Recommendations: I have reviewed the portions of the R&R as to which no objection has been raised, and find no clear error. Thus, I adopt as the decision of the Court all of the R&R except Part III.B.4, regarding the Step 5 analysis. Because the ALJ did not apply the wrong legal standards in using the grids and in not o btaining a vocational expert, and because his decision is supported by substantial evidence, Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is - essentially for the reasons stated by the Government - DENIED and Defendant's motion for judg ment on the pleadings is - essentially for the same reasons - GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motions. (Docs. 12, 14), enter judgment for Defendant, and close the case. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/18/2018) (jwh)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 18, 2018

Filing 20 ORDER adopting 12 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Cynthia Oneida Lebron, 14 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Carolyn W. Colvin, 17 Report and Recommendations: I have reviewed the portions of the R&R as to which no objection has been raised, and find no clear error. Thus, I adopt as the decision of the Court all of the R&R except Part III.B.4, regarding the Step 5 analysis. Because the ALJ did not apply the wrong legal standards in using the grids and in not o btaining a vocational expert, and because his decision is supported by substantial evidence, Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is - essentially for the reasons stated by the Government - DENIED and Defendant's motion for judg ment on the pleadings is - essentially for the same reasons - GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motions. (Docs. 12, 14), enter judgment for Defendant, and close the case. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/18/2018) (jwh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lebron v. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cynthia Oneida Lebron
Represented By:	Howard David Olinsky
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By:	Joseph Anthony Pantoja
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?