Hervochon v. Iona College

Hervochon v. Iona College

Plaintiff:	Kenneth M. Hervochon
Defendant:	Iona College
Case Number:	7:2014cv06017
Filed:	August 1, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	White Plains Office
County:	XX Out of State
Presiding Judge:	Cathy Seibel
Nature of Suit:	Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 27, 2019	Filing 346 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 335 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the January 18, 2019 R&R and the February 15, 2019 R&R are adopted as the decisions of the Court, except with the modifica tion described above regarding pre-judgment interest. Therefore, Goldberg is awarded 98% of contingency fee, less the $6,720.00 it has already received, and Gerber Ciano is awarded 2% of the contingency fee. Additionally, Iona� 39;s motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, Hennessey's motion is GRANTED, and Gotham's motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motions. (Docs. 259, 271, 293, 308, 317, 325.) Iona and Hennessey are to submit their proposed judgments to the Court by April 10, 2019. Before doing so, they should provide them to Gotham. If there are any objections to the calculations on Gotham's part and the parties cannot work them out, the parties' respective positions should be set forth in a joint letter. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/27/2019) (ks)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 27, 2019

Filing 346 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 335 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the January 18, 2019 R&R and the February 15, 2019 R&R are adopted as the decisions of the Court, except with the modifica tion described above regarding pre-judgment interest. Therefore, Goldberg is awarded 98% of contingency fee, less the $6,720.00 it has already received, and Gerber Ciano is awarded 2% of the contingency fee. Additionally, Iona� 39;s motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, Hennessey's motion is GRANTED, and Gotham's motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motions. (Docs. 259, 271, 293, 308, 317, 325.) Iona and Hennessey are to submit their proposed judgments to the Court by April 10, 2019. Before doing so, they should provide them to Gotham. If there are any objections to the calculations on Gotham's part and the parties cannot work them out, the parties' respective positions should be set forth in a joint letter. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/27/2019) (ks)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hervochon v. Iona College
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth M. Hervochon
Represented By:	William Gordon Kelly
Represented By:	Laura Ashley Martin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Iona College
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?