Tompkins v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Mark E. Tompkins
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 1:2013cv00911
Filed: September 9, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Buffalo Office
County: Niagara
Presiding Judge: Richard J. Arcara
Nature of Suit: Retirement and Survivors Benefits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 26 -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS denying 14 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting 20 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; adopting Report and Recommendations 25 . The Clerk of Court shall take the necessary steps to close this case. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on February 29, 2016. (APG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tompkins v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark E. Tompkins
Represented By: Lewis L. Schwartz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?