Talley v. Chautauqua Hills Ministry, Inc.
Plaintiff: Katlyn Talley
Defendant: Chautauqua Hills Ministry, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2014cv00309
Filed: April 24, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Buffalo Office
County: Chautauqua
Presiding Judge: William M. Skretny
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 34 DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion to Compel. Signed by Hon. Hugh B. Scott on 10/5/2015. (GAI)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Talley v. Chautauqua Hills Ministry, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Katlyn Talley
Represented By: Andrew A. Crosmer
Represented By: Adam J. Sedia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chautauqua Hills Ministry, Inc.
Represented By: Jody E. Briandi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?