Goupil v. Graham

Goupil v. Graham

Petitioner:	Mark Goupil
Respondent:	Harold Graham
Case Number:	1:2014cv00709
Filed:	August 27, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office:	Buffalo Office
County:	Cayuga
Presiding Judge:	William M. Skretny
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1651
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 25, 2018	Filing 26 DECISION AND ORDER that petitioner Mark Goupils request for a writ of habeas corpus is denied and the petition (Docket No. 1) is dismissed. Because there has not been a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 9/25/18. (Copy of this Decision and Order sent by first class mail to Petitioner.) (JMC)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
March 17, 2018	Filing 17 ORDER that Petitioner is afforded an opportunity to amend his petition to withdraw the unexhausted claim; withdraw his petition in its entirety, without prejudice and with leave to refile; or seek a stay-and-abeyance order to preserve the timeliness of his original petition while he returns to state court for the purpose of presenting his unexhausted claim to the state courts. Petitioner must notify the Court of which option he is electing within thirty (30) days of this Order. Failure to timely comply with the Courts instructions herein will result in the dismissal of the entire petition. (Copy of this Order sent by first class mail to Petitioner.) Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 3/16/18. (JMC)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 25, 2018

Filing 26 DECISION AND ORDER that petitioner Mark Goupils request for a writ of habeas corpus is denied and the petition (Docket No. 1) is dismissed. Because there has not been a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 9/25/18. (Copy of this Decision and Order sent by first class mail to Petitioner.) (JMC)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-

March 17, 2018

Filing 17 ORDER that Petitioner is afforded an opportunity to amend his petition to withdraw the unexhausted claim; withdraw his petition in its entirety, without prejudice and with leave to refile; or seek a stay-and-abeyance order to preserve the timeliness of his original petition while he returns to state court for the purpose of presenting his unexhausted claim to the state courts. Petitioner must notify the Court of which option he is electing within thirty (30) days of this Order. Failure to timely comply with the Courts instructions herein will result in the dismissal of the entire petition. (Copy of this Order sent by first class mail to Petitioner.) Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 3/16/18. (JMC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Goupil v. Graham
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Mark Goupil
Represented By:	Elizabeth A. Holmes
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Harold Graham
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?