Refermat v. Lancaster Central School District

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Western District Refermat v. Lancaster Central School District

Refermat v. Lancaster Central School District

Plaintiff:	Mary Refermat
Defendant:	Lancaster Central School District
Case Number:	1:2014cv00712
Filed:	August 27, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office:	Buffalo Office
County:	Erie
Presiding Judge:	Richard J. Arcara
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 31, 2018	Filing 52 ORDER: The Defendant, Lancaster Central School District, has filed a notice of interlocutory appeal 51 from this Court's August 1, 2018 Decision and Order 50 . Pursuant to the findings set forth in the attached Order, the Court concludes that it does retain subject-matter jurisdiction over this case. Absent order of the Second Circuit, trial will commence, as scheduled, on May 7, 2019. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 8/31/2018. (LAS)
August 1, 2018	Filing 50 DECISION AND ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge Michael J. Roemer's Report and Recommendation 40 in its entirety. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted to the extent it seeks judgment on the Plaintiff's constructive discha rge claim. Defendant's 24 motion for summary judgment is denied in all other respects. The parties shall appear on August 27, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. for a meeting to set a trial date. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 8/1/2018. (LAS)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 31, 2018

Filing 52 ORDER: The Defendant, Lancaster Central School District, has filed a notice of interlocutory appeal 51 from this Court's August 1, 2018 Decision and Order 50 . Pursuant to the findings set forth in the attached Order, the Court concludes that it does retain subject-matter jurisdiction over this case. Absent order of the Second Circuit, trial will commence, as scheduled, on May 7, 2019. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 8/31/2018. (LAS)

August 1, 2018

Filing 50 DECISION AND ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge Michael J. Roemer's Report and Recommendation 40 in its entirety. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted to the extent it seeks judgment on the Plaintiff's constructive discha rge claim. Defendant's 24 motion for summary judgment is denied in all other respects. The parties shall appear on August 27, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. for a meeting to set a trial date. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 8/1/2018. (LAS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Refermat v. Lancaster Central School District
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Lancaster Central School District
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Refermat
Represented By:	Harvey P. Sanders
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?