Buffalo Laborers Welfare Fund et al v. H&M Plumbing and Mechanical Contracting, Inc.
Buffalo Laborers Welfare Fund, Buffalo Laborers' Pension Fund, Buffalo Laborers Training Fund, Buffalo Laborers Security Fund, Thomas L. Panek and Laborers' Local 210, Laborers International Union of North America |
H&M Plumbing and Mechanical Contracting, Inc. |
1:2014cv00960 |
November 12, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Buffalo Office |
Albany |
William M. Skretny |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING Plaintiffs' 9 Motion for Default Judgment; DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiffs Buffalo Laborers Welfare Fund, Buffalo Laborers Pension Fund, Buffalo Laborers Training Fund, and Buffalo Laborers Security Fund, by Thomas L. Panek, in his fiduciary capacity as administrator, in the amount of $304,458.81; DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff Laborers' Local 210, Laborers Intern ational Union of North America in the amount of $15,470.87; DISMISSING without prejudice as abandoned Plaintiffs' fourth and fifth causes of action; DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to close this case. Signed by William M. Skretny, Chief Judge on 4/13/2015. (MEAL) - CLERK TO FOLLOW UP - |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.