Medina v. Artus et al
| Angel Medina |
| Dale Artus, T. Angrignon, John Doe Janora, Jane Doe White, John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe Kelsey, John Doe No. 4, John Doe No. 5 and John Doe No. 6 |
| 1:2015cv00427 |
| May 7, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Buffalo Office |
| Chemung |
| Richard J. Arcara |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
DECISION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's 91 motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a) is hereby granted. The matter has been recommitted to Magistrate Judge Marian Payson for further proceedings. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 1/10/2024. (LAS)
|
|
Filing
80
DECISION & ORDER Plaintiff's motion for a stay of these proceedings 76 is denied, and counsel's motion to withdraw as pro bono counsel 79 is denied. Both motions are denied without prejudice to renewal. Signed by Hon. Marian W. Payson on 5/17/2022. (KAH)
|
|
Filing
73
DECISION & ORDER Plaintiff's requests for appointment of counsel 60 62 64 70 are granted, and plaintiff's requests for copies of documents and authorization to proceed in forma pauperis 59 63 are denied as moot. This is a "full-scope appointment" pursuant to Rule 83.8(A)(1) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure, and "the appointed attorney shall represent [plaintiff] in the action until a final judgment is entered (or some other order is entered termi nating the action." The Court hereby directs that the Pro Bono Program Administrator begin the process for appointment of pro bono counsel. In doing so, the Pro Bono Program Administrator should make reasonable attempts to identify and appoint counsel who is able to converse in Spanish. Signed by Hon. Marian W. Payson on 5/25/2021. (KAH)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
|
|
Filing
71
DECISION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached Decision and Order, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 50 is granted with respect to Defendant Schlaggel, and denied with respect to defendants Angrignon and Janora. Plaintiff&# 039;s Motion for an Extension of Time 59 is denied. A copy of the Decision and Order along with this entry have been mailed to Angel Medina, 98-A-0333, BARE HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Caller Box 20, Malone, NY 12953-0020. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 5/6/2021. (LAS)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
