Document Security Systems, Inc. v. Coupons.com Incorporated
| Document Security Systems, Inc. |
| Coupons.com Incorporated |
| 6:2011cv06528 |
| October 24, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Monroe |
| Charles J. Siragusa |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
138
DECISION AND ORDER re 125 Bill of Costs filed by Coupons.com Incorporated. Defendants application for a Bill of Costs is granted in part and denied in part as set forth above. The parties are directed to settle and submit a proposed order regarding taxable costs, consistent with this Decision and Order, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Decision and Order. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 3/16/15. (KAP)
|
|
Filing
123
-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-DECISION AND ORDER granting 89 Sealed Motion. Defendants motion [#89] for summary judgment is granted, and this action is dismissed. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this action.Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 10/27/14. (KAP)
|
|
Filing
72
DECISION AND ORDER granting 30 Motion to Dismiss the second cause of action in the Amended Complaint. The action may proceed as to the first cause of action for breach of contract.. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 5/9/13. (KAP)
|
|
Filing
28
DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 23 Motion to Strike 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM re: Plaintiff's Second, Third, and Fourth Causes of A ction Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), 14 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint, 23 MOTION to Strike Argument Section IA of Plaintiff's Reply in Further Support of its Motion for Leave to Amend Pursuant to Local Rule 7(a)(6) MOTION to Strike Argument Section IA of Plaintiff's Reply in Further Support of its Motion for Leave to Amend Pursuant to Local Rule 7(a)(6). The Amended Complaint [#14-3] is now the operative pleading, although its third and fourth cause s of action are stricken for the reasons discussed herein. Presently, there are two claims in the action: breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets. Defendant is ordered to answer or otherwise move against the Amended Complaint within twenty (20) days of the date of this Decision and Order, unless the parties stipulate otherwise.. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 8/20/12. (KAP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Document Security Systems, Inc. v. Coupons.com Incorporated | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Document Security Systems, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Richard D. Rochford |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Coupons.com Incorporated | |
| Represented By: | Neil A Goteiner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
