McCallum v. Graham
Petitioner: David K. McCallum
Respondent: Harold Graham
Case Number: 6:2014cv06571
Filed: October 2, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Rochester Office
County: Cayuga
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth A. Wolford
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 18 -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- DECISION AND ORDER denying Petitioners application for a writ of habeas corpus and dismissing the petition. Motion terminated: 9 MOTION to include as part of plaintiff's record two affidavits re 5 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by David K. McCallum. (Clerk to close case.) Copy of Decision and Order sent by first class mail to Petitioner. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 6/1/2016. (JMC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCallum v. Graham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: David K. McCallum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Harold Graham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?