Neil v. Amoia
Petitioner: David O. Neil
Respondent: Sandra Amoia
Case Number: 6:2014cv06573
Filed: October 3, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Rochester Office
County: Livingston
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth A. Wolford
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 6 -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- DECISION AND ORDER denying petition for a writ of habeas corpus and dismissing the petition. Copy of Decision and Order sent by first class mail to petitioner. (Clerk to close case.) Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 5/9/16. (JMC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Neil v. Amoia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: David O. Neil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Sandra Amoia
Represented By: Alyson Gill (e-service) Arlene Roces (e-service)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?