Locenitt v. LaBrake et al
Kiaza Locenitt |
T. LaBrake, D. Vankelburg, D. Sagriff, R. Maloy, J. Cook, T. Ferguson, P. Brinkeroff and T. Jones |
6:2014cv06703 |
December 16, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Rochester Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Frank P. Geraci |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 50 DECISION AND ORDER: Defendant's 39 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and their 37 Motion to Preclude is DENIED AS MOOT. The Complaint is dismissed without prejudice, and the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Plaintiff is instructed to immediately re-file his complaint as a new action. He must also submit an in forma pauperis motion and prison authorization, or pay the filing and administrative fees ($400). SO ORDERED. A copy of this NEF and Decision and Order have been mailed to the pro se Plaintiff. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 2/12/2018. (AFM)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- |
Filing 45 ORDER denying 33 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Hon. Jonathan W. Feldman on 03/06/2017. A copy of this Order has been sent to pro se plaintiff, Kiaza Loccenitt, 13-A-3039, MARCY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Box 3600, Old River Road, Marcy, NY 13403. (JKT) |
Filing 21 ORDER denying 10 Motion to Dismiss. SO ORDERED. Plaintiff has been mailed this Order at his address of record. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 3/31/2016. (BD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.