Ellington v. County of Monroe et al
Charles R. Ellington |
County of Monroe, Monroe County Sheriff Patrick M. O'Flynn, Matthew Whiting, Michael Rieger, Todd Sutherland, Town of Gates, John Does 1, 2 and 3, John Does 4, 5, and 6 and John Does 7 - 12 |
6:2015cv06310 |
May 20, 2015 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Rochester Office |
Monroe |
Frank P. Geraci |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 DECISION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated, Defendants' motion, ECF Nos. 17 , 25 , is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, Plaintiff's sixth and seventh claims are dismissed, and his ninth claim survives. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the County of Monroe and Monroe County Sheriff Patrick M. O'Flynn as Defendants in this case. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 3/14/19. (JO)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- |
Filing 22 DECISION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 17 , is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Ellington's second, third, fourth, fifth, and eighth claims are dismissed and his first, sixth, seven th, and ninth claims survive. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate John Does 1-12 as Defendants in this case; all other Defendants remain. By separate order, the Court will schedule a status conference to set a trial date. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 12/17/18. (JO)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.