Fitzgerald v. Sun Tzu Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff: Scott Fitzgerald
Defendant: Sun Tzu Enterprises, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2013cv00159
Filed: June 26, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Eastern Division Office
County: NEWHANOVER
Presiding Judge: Terrence W. Boyle
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER GRANTING 11 Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. This case is remanded to New Hanover Superior Court. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 8/21/2013. (Fisher, M.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fitzgerald v. Sun Tzu Enterprises, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sun Tzu Enterprises, Inc.
Represented By: Joel R. Rhine
Represented By: Jean S. Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott Fitzgerald
Represented By: Andrew J. Hanley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?