Smoot Holdings, LLC et al v. City of Raleigh et al
| Smoot Holdings, LLC and David M. Smoot, III |
| City of Raleigh, Francis P. Rasberry, Jr. and Thomas A. McCormick |
| 5:2011cv00521 |
| September 30, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| WAKE |
| James C. Dever |
| Condemnation |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of Plaintiffs' Claims Without Prejudice [D.E. 46] is GRANTED. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Defendant City of Raleigh's counterclaim. Signed by Debby Sawyer, Deputy Clerk for Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 1/14/2013. (Sawyer, D.)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER denying 21 Motion to Dismiss and 29 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The court DIRECTS the parties to return to Wake County Superior Court in order to clarify under Rule 60(b) of North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure (or other ap propriate process) the scope ofthe Wake County Superior Court's judgment of March 26, 2010. The court DIRECTS the parties to report to the court not later than October 31, 2012, the status of any additional proceedings in Wake County Superior Court. If the parties desire, the court will then schedule and hold a status conference. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 7/13/2012. (Sawyer, D.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
