PlyGem Inc. v. International Chemical Workers Union Council of the United Food & Commercial Workers Union
| PlyGem Inc. |
| International Chemical Workers Union Council of the United Food & Commercial Workers Union |
| 5:2015cv00123 |
| March 25, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| WAKE |
| Terrence W. Boyle |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 704 |
| None |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PlyGem Inc. v. International Chemical Workers Union Council of the United Food & Commercial Workers Union | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: PlyGem Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Randall D. Avram |
| Represented By: | Drew K. Kifner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: International Chemical Workers Union Council of the United Food & Commercial Workers Union | |
| Represented By: | Narendra K. Ghosh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
