Manning v. Barefoot
Tasha S. Manning |
Napoleon Barefoot |
7:2010cv00114 |
June 7, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Southern Division Office |
COLUMBUS |
W. Earl Britt |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the court GRANTS plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [D.E. 1], and the Clerk is DIRECTED to file the complaint. The court DISMISSES plaintiff's complaint as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I). Signed by Judge James C. Dever, III on 6/18/2010. Copy served to Plaintiff via USPS. (Sawyer, D.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Manning v. Barefoot | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tasha S. Manning | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Napoleon Barefoot | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.