Cox, et al v. The Sampson County Board of Education, et al
||Clarinda Cox and Lionel Shawn Cox
||Teresa Holmes and The Sampson County Board of Education
||December 6, 2012
||North Carolina Eastern District Court
||Southern Division Office
||Louise Wood Flanagan
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Other
|Cause of Action:
||28:1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 24, 2013
ORDER denying 24 Motion to Stay Discovery - Signed by Magistrate Judge William A. Webb on 04/24/2013. (Baker, C.)
|September 25, 2013
ORDER terminating as moot 14 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and 15 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - This matter comes now before the court upon the clerk's report that the office is informed all issues in dispute, including plaintiffs' entitlement to relief as alleged and the disputes memorialized in defendants' motions to dismiss (DE 14, 15) for failure to state a claim, were resolved at mediation last week. The parties specifically are re ferred to Rule 17.1, Local Civil Rules. Unless good cause be shown for a further time extension, the court DIRECTS plaintiffs to tender to the court the proposed, conforming Order of Approval not later than forty-five (45) days from date of entry of this order, and any other settlement documentation deemed necessary by a party to accomplish a complete and final settlement, as negotiated. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 09/25/2013. (Baker, C.)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.