Thomas v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Leslie Tatum Thomas
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 7:2013cv00125
Filed: June 17, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Southern Division Office
County: BEAUFORT
Presiding Judge: Terrence W. Boyle
Nature of Suit: Social Security: HIA
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 427 Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER GRANTING 24 Defendant's Motion to Remand to the Commissioner. The Court hereby reverses the Commissioner's decision under sentence four and remands this case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. Signed by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 3/24/2014. (Fisher, M.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: Christian M. Vainieri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leslie Tatum Thomas
Represented By: H. Clifton Hester
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?