UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Dahmash's Personal Property, et al
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
Dahmash's Personal Property, A 2011 Toyota RAV4 and $11,845.45 in U. S. Currency |
Mohammed Ahmed Ahmed Dahmash |
7:2014cv00021 |
January 24, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Southern Division Office |
ONSLOW |
Louise Wood Flanagan |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 52 ORDER denying 37 Motion to Dismiss and adopting 46 Memorandum and Recommendation - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 3/14/2016. (Baker, C.) |
Filing 34 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 27 MOTION to Stay Action Pending Result of State Action and granting 31 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery - Former counsel, Walter Hoytt Paramore, III, is required to file an affidavit with the court attesting to his compliance with the North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct within 14 days. If any file materials remain to be provided by former counsel to the claimant, these shall be delivered to the claimant not later than 1 4 days from this date in accordance with this order. The discovery period is extended up to and through July 27, 2015. Dispositive motions are due September 11, 2015. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 04/24/2015. (Baker, C.) |
Filing 22 ORDER granting 21 Motion to Stay - The time period for the disposition of the case is hereby stayed until January 2, 2015. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 12/22/2014. (Baker, C.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.