UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Dahmash's Personal Property, et al
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: Dahmash's Personal Property, A 2011 Toyota RAV4 and $11,845.45 in U. S. Currency
Claimant: Mohammed Ahmed Ahmed Dahmash
Case Number: 7:2014cv00021
Filed: January 24, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Southern Division Office
County: ONSLOW
Presiding Judge: Louise Wood Flanagan
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 21 U.S.C. ยง 881
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER denying 37 Motion to Dismiss and adopting 46 Memorandum and Recommendation - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 3/14/2016. (Baker, C.)
April 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 27 MOTION to Stay Action Pending Result of State Action and granting 31 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery - Former counsel, Walter Hoytt Paramore, III, is required to file an affidavit with the court attesting to his compliance with the North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct within 14 days. If any file materials remain to be provided by former counsel to the claimant, these shall be delivered to the claimant not later than 1 4 days from this date in accordance with this order. The discovery period is extended up to and through July 27, 2015. Dispositive motions are due September 11, 2015. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 04/24/2015. (Baker, C.)
December 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER granting 21 Motion to Stay - The time period for the disposition of the case is hereby stayed until January 2, 2015. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 12/22/2014. (Baker, C.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Dahmash's Personal Property, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Stephen A. West
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dahmash's Personal Property
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A 2011 Toyota RAV4
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: $11,845.45 in U. S. Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: Mohammed Ahmed Ahmed Dahmash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?